Home
Momtastic
Site Map
Help
Register
Log In
 

Go Back   BabyandBump > Pregnancy Forums > Caesarean Section


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Mar 2nd, 2012, 01:56 AM   #11
mightyspu
Mum (Mom)
BnB Elite
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Berkshire
Posts: 14,006
And now I've been diagnosed as having gestational diabetes, I have an increased chance of another section if he's big..... I still have a chance at a VBAC, but hey I'd challenge anyone to try and give birth to a huge shouldered baby.....


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 2nd, 2012, 08:48 AM   #12
Six
Mum (Mom)
Active BnB Member
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 14
ooohh yes!!
everybody seems to think that a c-section is the easy way out, the non-painful way to give birth. Especially those who never went through an emergency c/s!
one of the midwives i talked to during my 18hrs of labour told be that i was too little to give birth naturally and that the baby was too big and thats why i didnt dilate enough to give birth vaginally. now i am convinced i didnt dilate because too many ppl around me kept on saying i couldnt do it on my own... (
ps: i was induced tho, which i believe is another of the reasons i eventually got a c/s.


Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 2nd, 2012, 11:06 AM   #13
mightyspu
Mum (Mom)
BnB Elite
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Berkshire
Posts: 14,006
I didn't dilate either, but I was put on the drip after my contractions stopped, so I don't think that helped me either


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 5th, 2012, 10:09 AM   #14
Six
Mum (Mom)
Active BnB Member
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 14
mightyspu, are you trying a vbac this time?


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 6th, 2012, 12:26 PM   #15
mightyspu
Mum (Mom)
BnB Elite
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Berkshire
Posts: 14,006
Yes hopefully, but I also have GD, so I may be induced at 39 weeks. Am feeling very determined though do you think you will go for a VBAC?


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 7th, 2012, 08:37 AM   #16
Six
Mum (Mom)
Active BnB Member
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 14
That'd be my dream! C-section left me too many insecurities and paranoias which I hope I'll be able to win through a vbac. Right now my new paranoia is: c/s has reduced my fertility. Of course I have no real reason to actually think my fertility is in any way reduced but when it comes to that i'm totally illogical.
Well, I really hope you can succeed in what you desire this time around!
xxx


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 7th, 2012, 08:39 AM   #17
Six
Mum (Mom)
Active BnB Member
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 14
sorry again, did they explain to you why you didn't dilate? were you induced the first time or did your labour start on its own? Just wondering bc, in my case, they just didn't give me any reasonable explanation as to why i didn't dilate more than 5 cm after 18 hours... *sigh*


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 7th, 2012, 08:52 AM   #18
mightyspu
Mum (Mom)
BnB Elite
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Berkshire
Posts: 14,006
There is no logic to our worries is there? If it helps, I conceived on cycle 2 of ttc #2, 13 months after my section Spent quite a while in shock at how quickly it had been, was expecting to ttc for much longer!


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 7th, 2012, 10:29 AM   #19
Annie77
Pregnant (Expecting)
Chat Happy BnB Member
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,744
My mum is 4ft 11, weighted 90lbs and gave birth to four children weighing in at between 9lb4 and 10lb9 (though not at same time!) She has wide hips, didn't dislocate any hips and didn't require any stitches, no tears and only used gas and air.

Me on the other hand - 2 x c-sections, 1 elective turned emergency and 1 elective.

I have taught manual handling to midwives and they have me well schooled in labour positions (not that I ever used them). If you have problems with hips or supra pubic dysfunction then giving birth on your back with feet in stirrups or pulling legs up towards you when pushing is an absolute no-no. For these people kneeling or standing facing back of bed is much better and causes less residual pain.

I do depise people who assume you are too posh to push or just incapable to giving birth naturally.


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Mar 7th, 2012, 10:53 AM   #20
mightyspu
Mum (Mom)
BnB Elite
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West Berkshire
Posts: 14,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie77 View Post
My mum is 4ft 11, weighted 90lbs and gave birth to four children weighing in at between 9lb4 and 10lb9 (though not at same time!) She has wide hips, didn't dislocate any hips and didn't require any stitches, no tears and only used gas and air.

Me on the other hand - 2 x c-sections, 1 elective turned emergency and 1 elective.

I have taught manual handling to midwives and they have me well schooled in labour positions (not that I ever used them). If you have problems with hips or supra pubic dysfunction then giving birth on your back with feet in stirrups or pulling legs up towards you when pushing is an absolute no-no. For these people kneeling or standing facing back of bed is much better and causes less residual pain.

I do depise people who assume you are too posh to push or just incapable to giving birth naturally.
Congratulations on your !

I was born with displaced hips, all is resolved now, however I have been left with reduced mobility and would not be able to pull my left leg up towards me. Thanks for this point, will put it in my birth plan!


 
Status: Offline
 
Reply

  BabyandBump > Pregnancy Forums > Caesarean Section


Bookmarks

Tags
birth, section, waaaay

Thread Tools






SEO by vBSEO