I knew that would come up at some point
This was something which really irritated me when it first circulated, not least because one of the parents involved actually turned up on BnB slating the Amby and telling anyone who still used them that we were idiots.
It really frustrates me that the article you linked does not give ANY details of the circumstances surrounding the two tragic deaths of babies who were in an Amby. The actual official result in the end was that the deaths were caused by MISUSE of the Amby, NOT the Amby itself.
In one of the cases, the Amby hammock was suspended, not from its frame, but from the doorframe of a laundry room (where both a washer and dryer were on). The baby was placed on its side (big no!) in the wrong end of the hammock (so gravity was working against it), and due to the condensation, the fabric became saturated and no longer breathable through. In the other case, I forget all the details, but again, baby was placed improperly (face down at the bottom of the hammock), which resulted in the other tragedy.
The lateral movement issue that article raised was corrected by a kit which Amby released later (if parents felt it was necessary, it was NEVER an issue I felt was a problem) but by that point, the media circus had done its work and America and Canada banned them.
They are still available in the UK. They were originally designed for use in places like SCBU in Australia, do you really think that if they were as deadly as they've been made out to be, then they would be used for poorly babies?
Sorry for the rant, but seriously, the whole debacle gets my back up. I was made out to be a bad parent last time for continuing to use a bed which I knew to be safe, and good for my child, all because a handful of parents didn't use the hammock correctly or safely