Pielette
Mum to little men
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 4,466
- Reaction score
- 0
My husband and I are having, well not an argument as such, but definitely a heated discussion over this. I mentioned about a month ago that I thought we needed to think about getting a will made and appointing a guardian for our LO if the horrid and unthinkable should happen. No not nice but I think it needs doing.
Unfortunately we can't agree on who Noah's guardian should be. He thinks it should be his sister and her husband. I think it should be my mum.
His reasoning for his sister;
She has two boys herself and it would be a family environment.
She and her husband are in their forties.
My reasoning for my mum;
Noah sees her at least twice a week and if I need someone to sit with him, it's my mum who does it. I don't trust anyone else with him. He knows her much better than my sister-in-law.
However, we have a couple of reasons against the other's choice. I don't want him to go to my sister-in-law because, as much as I like her (and I really do), she has a severe case of OCD and is neurotic about germs. She pulls her boys out of school if there are germs going around - one of her sons was born premature and is very susceptible to bugs so I get it completely, but if Noah were to live with them I'm certain the same thing would happen with him, in case he picked anything up and passed it along. I really wouldn't want his education to suffer, and I don't want him to be wrapped up in cotton wool. I want him to play and have fun, and not be concerned about bugs.
My husband doesn't want him to go to my mum because she's older and he doesn't want Noah to 'end up' looking after her when she becomes elderly. He also thinks that he would suffer from not having a family environment. Due to the recent break-up of my parents' marriage (some of you may remember since I've posted about my dad turning into a complete a-hole), she's vulnerable right now and my husband worries that she wouldn't cope. I maintain that without Noah she definitely wouldn't cope, because without him and us she would have nothing. I have no siblings, and if he went to my sister-in-law he would be two hours away from her by car.
My husband thinks I am being too emotional about this and thinking too much along the lines of 'what would my mum do without Noah?' I think he's being too clinical and I really would worry about the state of his education if he was brought up by my sister-in-law.
We cannot seem to reach an agreement. I know my mum would be absolutely gutted if he went to someone else. I've said that to my husband but he said his family would be gutted if he went to my mum. I don't really agree with that - they have a massive family and would have each other, and I would stipulate that my mum should make sure he spent time with them.
Has anyone else had this problem? How on earth did you resolve it? We've tried to find a compromise and suggest someone else, but there really isn't anyone else. Just don't know how to solve it and I feel it really needs doing. Any advice welcome.
Unfortunately we can't agree on who Noah's guardian should be. He thinks it should be his sister and her husband. I think it should be my mum.
His reasoning for his sister;
She has two boys herself and it would be a family environment.
She and her husband are in their forties.
My reasoning for my mum;
Noah sees her at least twice a week and if I need someone to sit with him, it's my mum who does it. I don't trust anyone else with him. He knows her much better than my sister-in-law.
However, we have a couple of reasons against the other's choice. I don't want him to go to my sister-in-law because, as much as I like her (and I really do), she has a severe case of OCD and is neurotic about germs. She pulls her boys out of school if there are germs going around - one of her sons was born premature and is very susceptible to bugs so I get it completely, but if Noah were to live with them I'm certain the same thing would happen with him, in case he picked anything up and passed it along. I really wouldn't want his education to suffer, and I don't want him to be wrapped up in cotton wool. I want him to play and have fun, and not be concerned about bugs.
My husband doesn't want him to go to my mum because she's older and he doesn't want Noah to 'end up' looking after her when she becomes elderly. He also thinks that he would suffer from not having a family environment. Due to the recent break-up of my parents' marriage (some of you may remember since I've posted about my dad turning into a complete a-hole), she's vulnerable right now and my husband worries that she wouldn't cope. I maintain that without Noah she definitely wouldn't cope, because without him and us she would have nothing. I have no siblings, and if he went to my sister-in-law he would be two hours away from her by car.
My husband thinks I am being too emotional about this and thinking too much along the lines of 'what would my mum do without Noah?' I think he's being too clinical and I really would worry about the state of his education if he was brought up by my sister-in-law.
We cannot seem to reach an agreement. I know my mum would be absolutely gutted if he went to someone else. I've said that to my husband but he said his family would be gutted if he went to my mum. I don't really agree with that - they have a massive family and would have each other, and I would stipulate that my mum should make sure he spent time with them.
Has anyone else had this problem? How on earth did you resolve it? We've tried to find a compromise and suggest someone else, but there really isn't anyone else. Just don't know how to solve it and I feel it really needs doing. Any advice welcome.