Ics, are they reliable?

zowiey

Nervously PG :)
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
1,501
Reaction score
0
I suppose this is a desperate hope from me more than anything else!

I am 2 days late, have a million symptoms (or maybe none, but a million in my head!) and keep getting :bfn: on the ic's. My cycles length is only 25 days, so being 2 days late makes me CD 27, so I should be getting something by now shouldn't I? Gah! I'm not making sense! And here was me believing that cycle no. 13 may be lucky for me.

Sorry for the incoherent rant!!
 
I had my bfp on sat and my lightest almost invisible line was on the ic. The others including digi's all confirmed I was pregnant. Maybe go get another test? Also - maybe you ovulated late and baby is implanting so wouldnt get a bfp yet..


:dust:
 
I'm wishing on anything at the moment! Thanks! And congrats on your BFP!!!
 
Thank you! Good luck and keep us informed!! More baby dust for you! :dust:
 
they have the highest sensitivity so should be ok- could still be a little early ??

good luck xxx
 
They might have the highest sensitivity but I tried 2 types digis, walmart equate +/-, and first response and they were all way easier to see than the ic.

:dust: for everyone ttc!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,202
Messages
27,141,467
Members
255,677
Latest member
gaiangel
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->