i wont watch it because it will pi$$ me off
and what i would love to know is why can woman like that have one child taken into care yet go on to have more children ?? it really baffles me!! it is obvious the 2nd child is not being looked after or why would he also be on the at-risk-register ??
I have seen people that have one kid go into care, and not the second or third-people change, and the reason they are put on strict watch by social services, is so that *in case* they mess up (even a little I might add) they will take the other kid into care as well. I know it is risky to take risks with children involved, but people do change, and usually until they show that they are a risk to the child, the child will remain with the parent. I think that in most cases, is it fair to give the mother a second chance (depending on her situation)
hya
im not picking at your post here by the way im just replying to it
ok so may be not all cases are fcuked off by the social services but on one example that i have shown if you read further back the woman im on about has been given chance after chance yet she still takes drugs and still has been able to keep her 18 month old daughter and is pregnant again the 18 month old was born addicted to drugs and now has health problems and this baby due next month will be born addicted to drugs too
i was just stating that this is wrong on so many levels why on earth would you do this to your child ? she doesnt want help for the drugs as she has been a heroin addict for 15 years and still continues to spend £80 a day on the stuff and doesnt even bother to try and get help she never has bothered! im actually still suprised she can even get pregnant with all the damage she has done to her body
and what makes me angry is why the hell are social services allowing it to happen because she gets complaints made against her all of the time! x x