Lurpak

Wobbles

BnB Co-Founder ~ Retired
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
90,191
Reaction score
40
I hate flora so I decided to go with lurpak!

Is this a good option? :oops:
 
Im not too familer with lurpak, whats the difference between this and normal butter? Have you ought a light version?

The best way to check is to see what the fat content is compared to your normal butter.
 
Looked good :lol:

Will compare after my bath :D
 
Ok fat details

Lurpak:

per 100g: 80g of which saturates 37g which sugars 1.0g

Uterrly butterly
per 100g: 59.0g of which saturates 19.5g which sugars 0.5g
although this says per serving (7g) 37 calories 4.1g fat

Bad choice wasn't it? Says on lurpak

natural veg oil
contains no additives artifical colouring or preservative
contains no hydrogenated fats or oils

Oh damn!!! :dohh:
 
I was about to say holy crap that aint good.

Dont be fooled that marg is any lower in fat than butter, it just uses negatable oil instead of animal fats. So its better for you as it has a lower percentage of saturated fats, but not any help in slimming.

You need to look for light and low options, whether butter or marg.
 
Think my whole plan over all is to cut it out as much as I can rather than go for lower fat butter! I'll stick with utterly I think :? Unless I find something better in tesco later!
 
TOP TIP: Always butter your toast cool. It doesn't melt in so much then and you'll use less :wink:
 
i love lurpak too much to give it up :lol: Its so yummy! But i'd have to buy my own butter if i wanted to change anyway. DH and FIL would still use lurpak. Added expence we dont need right now :roll:

wobbs, i say stick with what u like just use less 8)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,196
Messages
27,141,333
Members
255,676
Latest member
An1583
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->