nuchal translucency

JustMe.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
521
Reaction score
0
the result i got at my scan when i was 13+5 was 1.60mm. Is this a good result? What were your results x
 
It doesn't mean anything without the corresponding blood tests. Did you get them done?
 
Yeah got the blood tests aswell, got a letter saying i was low risk but just wondered actually how low risk 1.60mm is if u no wat i mean x
 
I've never had the tests but this pregnancy they were training for taking nt measurements and said it has to be combined with the appropriate blood tests. I've no idea how that is done. I was under the impression that when the results are returned there is usually a ratio included indicating risk, 1 in however many, which is the product of both the nt and the blood tests.
 
0.9 mm and with my blood results I was given 'less than 1:10'000'
 
you can only take the overall risk score and not just part of the test alone. If you came out low risk then that's great. You would have been told about any issues. Jx
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,197
Messages
27,141,362
Members
255,676
Latest member
An1583
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->