Heather212
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2009
- Messages
- 242
- Reaction score
- 0
I've been noticing this since I registered for my prenatal visits. I guess it's not a huge deal. I never really commented on it until this week when I saw my latest chart, but I do remember thinking that there ought to be a third option for those of us who DO have a partner but are cohabiting or in an otherwise long term relationship.
I don't really consider myself "single" and I doubt most ladies here in serious relationships or who are living with their partners think of themselves that way!
Certainly, I don't judge anyone who is actually single and having a baby on their own (I was considering a sperm bank/friend donor before I met my current partner!). I believe that single women (and men) should have the right to reproduce if they so choose and have the means to raise a child.
However, I don't believe it would be accurate for me to describe myself as a "single woman" right now!
"Single" to me means WITHOUT A PARTNER.
And I believe that's the definition that most people use nowadays. Go on any networking or dating website and you will see the word "single" being used as a synonym to "romantically available/unattached"
"Sign up and meet other singles!" is usually the standard greeting on matchmaking sites.
Are we supposed to believe that the above message is intended for us ladies who are cohabiting or otherwise partnered? Not at all, because it's not for us. It's for ACTUAL singles lol.
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but I feel as though giving us only two options in the form of "single" vs "legally married" is a little bit arbitrary and socially retrograde.
I was raised in the Catholic faith so I respect the religious point of view (cohabitation is not really accepted or encouraged), but I am now an agnostic and so is my partner. So I don't believe that the whole world should be held to religiously based definitions of what constitutes a partnership.
I feel the Single/Legally Married dichotomy is as obsolete as some of those laws against oral sex
Is anyone else bothered by this?
I don't really consider myself "single" and I doubt most ladies here in serious relationships or who are living with their partners think of themselves that way!
Certainly, I don't judge anyone who is actually single and having a baby on their own (I was considering a sperm bank/friend donor before I met my current partner!). I believe that single women (and men) should have the right to reproduce if they so choose and have the means to raise a child.
However, I don't believe it would be accurate for me to describe myself as a "single woman" right now!
"Single" to me means WITHOUT A PARTNER.
And I believe that's the definition that most people use nowadays. Go on any networking or dating website and you will see the word "single" being used as a synonym to "romantically available/unattached"
"Sign up and meet other singles!" is usually the standard greeting on matchmaking sites.
Are we supposed to believe that the above message is intended for us ladies who are cohabiting or otherwise partnered? Not at all, because it's not for us. It's for ACTUAL singles lol.
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but I feel as though giving us only two options in the form of "single" vs "legally married" is a little bit arbitrary and socially retrograde.
I was raised in the Catholic faith so I respect the religious point of view (cohabitation is not really accepted or encouraged), but I am now an agnostic and so is my partner. So I don't believe that the whole world should be held to religiously based definitions of what constitutes a partnership.
I feel the Single/Legally Married dichotomy is as obsolete as some of those laws against oral sex
Is anyone else bothered by this?