Mari30me
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,370
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey ladies,
Just wondering if any of you have had a big baby or babies first, then had a smaller baby? My dd weighed 9lb11oz(41 weeks) and my ds weighed 9lb7oz. I had growth scan done when I was pregnant with my ds. At 27+1 he was estimated at 3.5lb and at 35 weeks he was estimated at 7lb14oz. Those estimates were pretty good because he was 9lb7oz when he came at 40 weeks. I just had a growth scan last week for ds2, was 28+1, and he was estimated at 2lb and in 50% for weight. OB said he was just an average size baby. She did say they could pack on alot of weight near end, but I wonder what my chances are for having a smaller baby? Like 8lb or less. I was 29+3 yesterday and my fundal height was 32cm! lol I know ultrasound estimates can be way off sometimes, so I am just curious. Any input would be great
Just wondering if any of you have had a big baby or babies first, then had a smaller baby? My dd weighed 9lb11oz(41 weeks) and my ds weighed 9lb7oz. I had growth scan done when I was pregnant with my ds. At 27+1 he was estimated at 3.5lb and at 35 weeks he was estimated at 7lb14oz. Those estimates were pretty good because he was 9lb7oz when he came at 40 weeks. I just had a growth scan last week for ds2, was 28+1, and he was estimated at 2lb and in 50% for weight. OB said he was just an average size baby. She did say they could pack on alot of weight near end, but I wonder what my chances are for having a smaller baby? Like 8lb or less. I was 29+3 yesterday and my fundal height was 32cm! lol I know ultrasound estimates can be way off sometimes, so I am just curious. Any input would be great