Feisty Fidget
Rainbow Baby
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2010
- Messages
- 4,392
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi lovelies ![flower :flower: :flower:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/flower.gif)
We were advised that we were high risk for T13 and T18 at our 12 weeks combined screening scan/bloods. Prior to this shock I had never heard of Edwards and Patau syndrome so you can bet we were terrified![Cry :cry: :cry:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/cry.gif)
After a lot of tears and tantrums we decided to listen to the advice of our midwife and scrape together the £500 needed for a harmony test at the foetal medicine centre in London. We had the test a week ago and were relieved to be told that the scan was looking good, but advised they needed the bloods to confirm we were in fact low risk.
I had a call from them yesterday advising the test had come back as failed, I was offered a partial refund or a re-test. I was warned that the re-test only had a 50% chance of success.
Obviously I feel like we are still in limbo and desperately want an answer to whether we are high risk (as the NHS believes) or low risk (as the in-depth private scan indicated). However, getting re-tested causes all sorts of issues (we are in the west country so it is a high expense going again for a 5 minute blood sample appointment) and I'd also need to take another day off work. Deep down I know our blood test will fail again (if something is going to go wrong, it always does for us!).
Does anyone know if the Nifty test will have a better chance at a positive result? Part of me is wondering if it's worth a partial refund (not available if I have the re-test) and going for the Nifty, or are the tests so similar that the chances of enough DNA material being drawn in my sample are likely to be the same?
![flower :flower: :flower:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/flower.gif)
We were advised that we were high risk for T13 and T18 at our 12 weeks combined screening scan/bloods. Prior to this shock I had never heard of Edwards and Patau syndrome so you can bet we were terrified
![Cry :cry: :cry:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/cry.gif)
After a lot of tears and tantrums we decided to listen to the advice of our midwife and scrape together the £500 needed for a harmony test at the foetal medicine centre in London. We had the test a week ago and were relieved to be told that the scan was looking good, but advised they needed the bloods to confirm we were in fact low risk.
I had a call from them yesterday advising the test had come back as failed, I was offered a partial refund or a re-test. I was warned that the re-test only had a 50% chance of success.
Obviously I feel like we are still in limbo and desperately want an answer to whether we are high risk (as the NHS believes) or low risk (as the in-depth private scan indicated). However, getting re-tested causes all sorts of issues (we are in the west country so it is a high expense going again for a 5 minute blood sample appointment) and I'd also need to take another day off work. Deep down I know our blood test will fail again (if something is going to go wrong, it always does for us!).
Does anyone know if the Nifty test will have a better chance at a positive result? Part of me is wondering if it's worth a partial refund (not available if I have the re-test) and going for the Nifty, or are the tests so similar that the chances of enough DNA material being drawn in my sample are likely to be the same?