LoveleeB
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 0
Just looking for some opinions please.
My son was born at 31 weeks. When he was released from hospital he was seen by a regular GP who over the course of the year became concerned due to his quick head growth. According to the head circumference growth chart, his head went from being bellow the 5th percentil to the 94th percentile. I've been freaking out about it, but just the other day I found out that when he was born his head was in the 93 percentile. So I rechecked the chart my doctor had done and she was not using his adjusted age. So, yes, he was below the 5th percentile when he was 9 weeks old, but technically he was 0 at that measurement. When I recharted the results based on his adjusted age, he has always been between the 90th and 95th percentile.
So my question is, do I use the adjusted age information or the actual age?
(as a sidenote, his weight and height all grew at the same rate as his head)
Thanks for your opinions!
My son was born at 31 weeks. When he was released from hospital he was seen by a regular GP who over the course of the year became concerned due to his quick head growth. According to the head circumference growth chart, his head went from being bellow the 5th percentil to the 94th percentile. I've been freaking out about it, but just the other day I found out that when he was born his head was in the 93 percentile. So I rechecked the chart my doctor had done and she was not using his adjusted age. So, yes, he was below the 5th percentile when he was 9 weeks old, but technically he was 0 at that measurement. When I recharted the results based on his adjusted age, he has always been between the 90th and 95th percentile.
So my question is, do I use the adjusted age information or the actual age?
(as a sidenote, his weight and height all grew at the same rate as his head)
Thanks for your opinions!