These are positive, right?

CanadianMaple

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
1,261
Reaction score
1
I have never tried an OPK this early, but had EWCM a few days after AF. I am sure these are positive. It was so strange to me, I tend to ovulate around CD17. The only thing is, my cervical fluid and cervix aren't seeming as fertile, in fact, I only had sticky CF yesterday.

I got a dollar store test, thinking my ICs were faulty but it looks + too...

If this was a positive, any idea why so early without other signs?

https://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b63/canadianmaple/photo10.jpg
 
If you're curious, my chart is: https://www.tcoyf.com/members/canadianmaple/pccharts/default.aspx
 
I have never tried an OPK this early, but had EWCM a few days after AF. I am sure these are positive. It was so strange to me, I tend to ovulate around CD17. The only thing is, my cervical fluid and cervix aren't seeming as fertile, in fact, I only had sticky CF yesterday.

I got a dollar store test, thinking my ICs were faulty but it looks + too...

If this was a positive, any idea why so early without other signs?

https://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b63/canadianmaple/photo10.jpg

Those do look just about positive (maybe full positive tomorrow...?!)
I've heard that sometimes you can get a + on the OPKs but never actually ovulate... but temping is supposed to be more accurate... I would pay more attention to that over the OPKs... Sorry I'm not more help! GL - :dust: and get to Bd'ing just in case ;)
 
Just an update, I didn't get my temp shift and got a negative yesterday and then another negative today. Today's was closer to + again. I'm starting to get a soft cervix and more fertile fluid, so I think I will see another + later this week.
 
Just an update, I didn't get my temp shift and got a negative yesterday and then another negative today. Today's was closer to + again. I'm starting to get a soft cervix and more fertile fluid, so I think I will see another + later this week.

IMO it looks like that's exactly what's happening...


:dust:
 
they look postive to me, the only safe way is just to BD :) better safe than sorry
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,283
Messages
27,143,779
Members
255,746
Latest member
coco.g
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->