Hammy58
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 173
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi everyone!!!
I hope everyone is hanging in there with your personal journeys and staying strong!
I have some questions about the assessment/evaluation process. I've just been raking my brain today, kind of obsessing over my son's recent evaluation. It's actually currently in process they have yet to do the speech/communication portion.
Some background before I get to my current questions. My son had his first evaluation 6 months ago because I called Early On with concerns about his speech. It was determined through the first evaluation that he was behind in speech, communication, fine motor, cognition and social. He was over a year behind in most areas if not a bit more (18 months). When I got the official report it sucked. Very emotional. But overall I agreed with it. I felt that he was behind and even by that much. He was inconsistently saying 6 words at this point speech wise and just kind of acted immature for his age. He was 24 months when this evaluation was done.
Fast forward to present day, he is almost 30 months now. He is a totally different kid. He now has a vocabulary of about 200 words I would say and is combining and using sentences occasionally (simple ones like choo choo broke, bye bye orange fishy, see you later diesel (our dog's name)) etc. He's also just exploded cognition wise. He's counting one to ten, recognizes the numbers, knows most of his alphabet with letter recognition, knows basic colors and shapes, great at sorting. I mean he is just a different kid, he has come such a long way and I am proud of him!
Seeing these crazy changes I feel like we have come so far and was hoping to see this in the reevaluation. Thus far our therapist has made it through fine motor, cognition, and gross motor in the reevaluation. She told us immediately after we finished up the other day that his skills are scattered from 15-48 months! First question.....has anyone had a scattering of skills this large? It seems odd to me.
She said his baseline was 15 months, and I find this hard to believe. I was present. When we initially started there were quite a few skills that he wasn't interested in and didn't even attempt (although we have done them a million times at home, for instance finding an object under a cup which he does easily) so she has to mark those as he couldn't do because she did not see him do them. As we continued with the evaluation he became more interested and just smashed it out of the ballpark (hence the skillset of 48 months which was for a large portion cognition). I'm just perturbed because unlike the first evaluation at 24 months which I agreed with where he was at and the results, I just don't agree with this. I really feel like it's off and I'm concerned because he will be starting special education preschool next school year and it is based off this evaluation. I want the correct information going to his school district because I want him to get the best help possible. I do think he's behind still in some areas, but not at the age level of 15 months. This was done using the Carolina evaluation. I've heard many talk of the Ruths-Griffith (I may have spelling wrong on that). What is the difference between these two?
I could ask the school district to do an evaluation on him rather than Early On so that they can go off their own evaluation and maybe get a better picture. I feel like this is an option for us but is it worth it? Am I overthinking this? I guess because I'm not sure exactly how they will use this in his schooling I'm just confused. I also want to say I think we have a fantastic therapist and by no means do I think she administered this incorrectly. I just feel like I have a typical 2.5 year old who needs to be interested in what he is doing to "perform".
Thanks for reading this incredibly long post. I appreciate any feedback or experiences with this.
I hope everyone is hanging in there with your personal journeys and staying strong!
I have some questions about the assessment/evaluation process. I've just been raking my brain today, kind of obsessing over my son's recent evaluation. It's actually currently in process they have yet to do the speech/communication portion.
Some background before I get to my current questions. My son had his first evaluation 6 months ago because I called Early On with concerns about his speech. It was determined through the first evaluation that he was behind in speech, communication, fine motor, cognition and social. He was over a year behind in most areas if not a bit more (18 months). When I got the official report it sucked. Very emotional. But overall I agreed with it. I felt that he was behind and even by that much. He was inconsistently saying 6 words at this point speech wise and just kind of acted immature for his age. He was 24 months when this evaluation was done.
Fast forward to present day, he is almost 30 months now. He is a totally different kid. He now has a vocabulary of about 200 words I would say and is combining and using sentences occasionally (simple ones like choo choo broke, bye bye orange fishy, see you later diesel (our dog's name)) etc. He's also just exploded cognition wise. He's counting one to ten, recognizes the numbers, knows most of his alphabet with letter recognition, knows basic colors and shapes, great at sorting. I mean he is just a different kid, he has come such a long way and I am proud of him!
Seeing these crazy changes I feel like we have come so far and was hoping to see this in the reevaluation. Thus far our therapist has made it through fine motor, cognition, and gross motor in the reevaluation. She told us immediately after we finished up the other day that his skills are scattered from 15-48 months! First question.....has anyone had a scattering of skills this large? It seems odd to me.
She said his baseline was 15 months, and I find this hard to believe. I was present. When we initially started there were quite a few skills that he wasn't interested in and didn't even attempt (although we have done them a million times at home, for instance finding an object under a cup which he does easily) so she has to mark those as he couldn't do because she did not see him do them. As we continued with the evaluation he became more interested and just smashed it out of the ballpark (hence the skillset of 48 months which was for a large portion cognition). I'm just perturbed because unlike the first evaluation at 24 months which I agreed with where he was at and the results, I just don't agree with this. I really feel like it's off and I'm concerned because he will be starting special education preschool next school year and it is based off this evaluation. I want the correct information going to his school district because I want him to get the best help possible. I do think he's behind still in some areas, but not at the age level of 15 months. This was done using the Carolina evaluation. I've heard many talk of the Ruths-Griffith (I may have spelling wrong on that). What is the difference between these two?
I could ask the school district to do an evaluation on him rather than Early On so that they can go off their own evaluation and maybe get a better picture. I feel like this is an option for us but is it worth it? Am I overthinking this? I guess because I'm not sure exactly how they will use this in his schooling I'm just confused. I also want to say I think we have a fantastic therapist and by no means do I think she administered this incorrectly. I just feel like I have a typical 2.5 year old who needs to be interested in what he is doing to "perform".
Thanks for reading this incredibly long post. I appreciate any feedback or experiences with this.