I'll join the FB group once it is secret. I have too many nosey family members on FB
Haha I can totally relate!
I'll join the FB group once it is secret. I have too many nosey family members on FB
Sad news to report on my end. My hcg level was about 8,000 on Wednesday and only up to 9,800 on Friday. My doctor's nurse called yesterday and said I'm likely to miscarry. I have an ultrasound on Monday just to see, but it's possibly a blighted ovum based on the gestational sac being empty at 5w4d, combined with the slow rise of my hcg.
Sad news to report on my end. My hcg level was about 8,000 on Wednesday and only up to 9,800 on Friday. My doctor's nurse called yesterday and said I'm likely to miscarry. I have an ultrasound on Monday just to see, but it's possibly a blighted ovum based on the gestational sac being empty at 5w4d, combined with the slow rise of my hcg.
Sad news to report on my end. My hcg level was about 8,000 on Wednesday and only up to 9,800 on Friday. My doctor's nurse called yesterday and said I'm likely to miscarry. I have an ultrasound on Monday just to see, but it's possibly a blighted ovum based on the gestational sac being empty at 5w4d, combined with the slow rise of my hcg.
So sorry writing x x xxSad news to report on my end. My hcg level was about 8,000 on Wednesday and only up to 9,800 on Friday. My doctor's nurse called yesterday and said I'm likely to miscarry. I have an ultrasound on Monday just to see, but it's possibly a blighted ovum based on the gestational sac being empty at 5w4d, combined with the slow rise of my hcg.
Hey mitchnorm and sausages, that's an interesting issue.
I have been thinking about it as well. I will be doing the NT measurements and the blood tests. There's an algorithm that combines all those tests along with your age and provides a risk ratio for abnormalities. If it's high enough, then they recommend amniocentesis. Or at least that's what they do where I'm from.
In reality however, the way the numbers add up make it so that everyone above the age of 35 is a candidate for amniocentesis based on age alone. The blood tests are still a good idea, since they can also detect a good number of non-genetic problems, such as neural tube defects. I'm close to that age, so I'm already thinking of the amniocentesis issue. I guess I'll keep sleeping on it until then...
(If I start getting too technical about the medical details, feel free to tell me to tone it down a bit.... I've entered the worry-wort phase, lol)
A FB group sounds awesome Brandi It'll be one of those groups that don't get posted on my friends newsfeeds right? I'm guessing so but just checking because I'm paranoid about the cat being let out of the bag before I'm ready to announce
Hi GoE! Weren't we due with our daughters at the same time? Spud is an August 2012 baby although I know your lady made an early appearance!
Sad news to report on my end. My hcg level was about 8,000 on Wednesday and only up to 9,800 on Friday. My doctor's nurse called yesterday and said I'm likely to miscarry. I have an ultrasound on Monday just to see, but it's possibly a blighted ovum based on the gestational sac being empty at 5w4d, combined with the slow rise of my hcg.
Gosh, the whole question of terminating or not is such a personal thing. I would never judge anyone for choosing one way or the other.
For me, I will have full testing. If my NT comes back high risk I will pay for the harmony/panorama test as it gives greater accuracy. If THAT also comes back high risk I'll have an amniocentesis. I would need to know for certain before I could make any decisions and amnio is the only sure way.
Gosh, the whole question of terminating or not is such a personal thing. I would never judge anyone for choosing one way or the other.
For me, I will have full testing. If my NT comes back high risk I will pay for the harmony/panorama test as it gives greater accuracy. If THAT also comes back high risk I'll have an amniocentesis. I would need to know for certain before I could make any decisions and amnio is the only sure way.
Sausages, the harmony/panorama test (NIPT) is 99.8% accurate. I had it done with my second pregnancy after my NT scan and bloods came back with a 1:44 risk of Downs. I chose to have it due to the zero risk of it possibly causing a miscarriage and it's accuracy is actually higher than amniocentesis. As advised by my obstetrician with my last pregnancy that ended as a MMC, there is no need for the NT studies if you choose to have the NIPT done. So as I'm a high risk patient due to my age and past history, I'll be going straight for the NIPT this time round.