Heartbeat theory - wrong for me! Ramzi... depends on how you look at it...

Lues

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
550
Reaction score
0
Well ladies and gentleman... drumroll please...

.... we're having a BOY!!!!!

I'm SOOOO excited.

Just thought some of you may be interested in a few things:

The heartbeat theory that a high heartbeats are girls: not for me!!! Early heartbeat at 8.5 weeks weeks was 178, 10.5 weeks was 180. Pretty darn high actually.

Ramzi theory: My first ultrasound was at 5 weeks, transvaginal, yolk sac was to MY left LOOKING AT the photo (which one could surmise means the placenta was also to my left looking at the photo). BUT, my 6.5 week ultrasound showed a pretty clear placenta growing on the other side (you Ramzi's know what I mean, the bright white section).

As the weeks went on, the placenta kept growing on that side and I've confirmed with the tech that it is in fact where the placenta is, and that the photo is NOT flipped .

So depending on how you look at the Ramzi one... my 5 week scan would make Ramzi CORRECT. And he did his tests at 6 weeks, so my 6.5 ultrasound could have been too late. But most people don't have scans as early as I do, and certainly not so many. (high risk)

But I say all this just to sort of babble... forgive me.

I'm just so excited to be having a boy. I would have been happy either way. But the idea of raising a son with my husband is just soooo exciting.

So good luck to everyone!!!

:cloud9:
 
Congratulations. Hb theory has hasn't been right for any of my pregnancies either lol
 
Awwww, congrats to you!!!! <3 Our baby's heartrate has always been high and we both feel like it's a boy too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,369
Messages
27,148,224
Members
255,802
Latest member
samaniego
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"