Hi JJE lol

Is this the first time you've tried to do a ticker? It looks as though you've put in the wrong code. Did you want me to get it and paste it for you? pM your lilypie password etc and I'll pm back the code you need to insert.
Ok, stitch removal at 34wks. Usual protocol is removal at 34wks for twins and 36wks for singles on the basis that twin labour generally starts earlier than a singleton labour. It sounds as though your doc believes there is a reasonable chance this Lo could come earlier than average and so is removing the stitch to avoid complications if you were to go into labour.
I personally would challenge this hun. Because I ended up having a scheduled ceasarean with the twins, my stitch wasn't removed until section day at 38wks! My consultant told me that I'd just have to get to hospital quickly if I felt anything like labour so that it could be removed before doing any potential cervical damage. I am so glad they didn't remove it now, because the surgery might have caused me to labour earlier.
Most of the time stitch removal doesn't cause labour, and in fact most women go on for several more weeks afterwards, even when their cervixes immediately dilate after removal. Even at 3/4cms at 34wks, your cervix will only dilate further under the influence of strong, regular contractions. Baby will not just fall out at that gestation, so if they insist on early removal, it is unlikely to cause sudden labour.
I'd ask if they can leave it in longer, it is your right to do so. I'd atleast want to know the reasoning behind removing it early. Your baby is petite, but as you say this is more likely a genetically small frame than any growth restriction, especially if she has always been on a smaller growth curve. Hope that helps xxx