MizzPodd
1 girl,1 angel,1 rainbow
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Messages
- 1,149
- Reaction score
- 0
Amy - sorry about more bleeding, still thinking of you
Chocolatecat - glad your procedure went well and that they are keeping an eye on you. I stayed overnight last time and this time had it done as day surgery, although it was a bit sore walking to the car so soon after I was glad to be at home
Shelby - thanks for the update B & T are gorgeous, hoping they are both home soon
MizzPodd - I replied to your message hun. Although you keep saying you don't have IC, to me everything you've said points towards it. Also when I was funneled I did then have a suture placed both times so I believe that is what got me to term rather than anything else. My first labour was also spontaneous and although I had funelling in the two pregnancies after that my cervix has always stayed a reasonable length. Also my cervix is normally long and closed (i.e strong) all the way to 20 weeks so just because you have a long cervix closed aside from funneling does not mean that you don't have IC, the first place for it to be seen is internally as funneling on a scan. In fact if your doc has spotted that on a scan and you have no signs of it being pre-term labour (i.e it has funneled without needing contractions to do so), I really do feel that he ought to be offering a suture before any more changes occur. I hope that doesn't come across as too blunt, could you get an opinion from another doc?
AFM - Went for my 32 week appointment with the consultant today. He has booked my stitch removal for the 5th FebHowever, I seem to be carrying a little large. I measured 34 weeks today I think which is only 2 weeks ahead, but 4 weeks ago I measured 5 weeks ahead! He felt my bump today as well as the midwife and both think I may have some excess fluid, so have been booked for a growth/amniotic fluid check scan tomorrow afternoon. He also wants me to have a GTT to make sure that is negative as it can apparently cause excess fluid. So I'm a little worried about that now instead of the IC
Of course I do get to see the little man again and check that he is in fact still a he!
![]()
Thank you and I don't have a problem with your bluntness because I like to be told things straight up
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fab1/0fab178474aef7d97baf7691d5d08e124ab03336" alt="Smile :) :)"
I've been seen by multiple ob docs and they are
saying similar conclusions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79034/790342bde3ef5687979f45eab1f492b102455be8" alt="Sad :( :("