Is back labour more painful??!

ParisJeTadore

Mum to my beautiful kids!
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
2,331
Reaction score
0
I need some advice and support ladies!

I had 36 hours of labour and had back labour the ENTIRE time. I did not feel one "menstrual cramp" type pain associated with contractions and absolutely no pain in the front of my body from start to finish. Needless to say, by the time I was at 8cm the pain was excruciating.

I did hypnosis and did great up until 7cm but it did not decrease the pain I felt by any means. I've been told back labour is way more painful than regular labour and I'm starting to feel like a failure after reading so many women describe labour pain as being "not that bad" or worse "it only needs to be as painful as you want it to be". This was not the case for me despite being told by hospital staff that I had a high pain threshhold for what I went through.

I really want to have another baby but I am terrified of going through that level of pain again. Has anyone had full on back labour than gone on to have a less painful regular labour??
 
HUGE :hug: girl!!! I TOTALLY know this feeling!

So, my first was face up (persistant posterior). I had back labor 100% of the time. Even when i was only 2CM i was in EXCRUCIATING pain because of it. So when i got pregnant again, i literally sobbed thinking about going through that. I knew i wanted another unmedicated birth and the thought of dealing w back labor again truly upset me. I figured i was doomed to have it. Well, can i just say i had ZERO back labor with the birth of my second child!!!!! I could not believe the difference. So for me, HELLLLL Yesss back labor is a million times worse! In fact,my care giver with the birth of DS1 told me if i can do that labor, i can do most any of them bc she said back labor from a posterior is the worst pain you can get. Now not all women have an issue with it but my God it was horrible. But fear not! As i said my second birth was not only a million times faster but i had no back labor-at all! I was happily surprised. I did have double peaking contractions that lasted a long time, but hon let me just say that those are far more "pleasant" than any back labor!
 
My LO was back labour. It was awful so I feel your pain.

I don't have anything to compare it to yet, but I'm going to chance it again. I'm pretty sure its going to hurt either way!
 
I had a back labour with my son, it was awful and when I got pregnant again I was terrified of how painful labour would be again.

When I went into labour with my daughter I actually thought it was a false alarm because the pain was nothing compared to what the back labour was like, it still hurt, but nowhere near the level of pain of the back labour. It was quite a shock when I got to hospital and was told I was 8cm dilated :haha:
 
I had a back labour with my son, it was awful and when I got pregnant again I was terrified of how painful labour would be again.

When I went into labour with my daughter I actually thought it was a false alarm because the pain was nothing compared to what the back labour was like, it still hurt, but nowhere near the level of pain of the back labour. It was quite a shock when I got to hospital and was told I was 8cm dilated :haha:

Thank you Wiggler! That is the best news I've had all week. :haha:
 
Thank you ladies, this is really filling me with confidence!

I had a 5 day, back to back labour with my son and ended up with an epidural at 8cm as it hurt so much and I was exhausted. I really felt like a wimp when my antenatal friends said their labours were not as painful as they expected them to be... I am hoping that when this baby decides to make an appearence that it will be a lot quicker and easier than before!
 
well if you're a wimp then I must just be the biggest wimp EVER because I didn't have back labour, and still needed epidurals every single time ;)

don't feel like a failure you silly sausage!
 
DS was back to back, he turned as I was getting to the end of pushing. I had contractions in the front and back but once he'd turned I only had pain at the front- relief! :). My labour wasn't too painful but it was definitely better once I just had contractions in the front :)
 
I started with back labour. Had three days of contractions in my back then when i was in active labour she turned and it hurt obviously but not like back labour!
 
Back labor is HELL!! I had it with both boys, and needed that epidural! So no, if you did it with no meds kudos to you!! Lord knows I never could have!!!!
 
I had back labour with a home birth (12 hours). It was hard, but it was not as hard as a regular pitocin-induced labour.
 
I had an induced 24 hour back labour, with failed epidural and eventual emcs. I sound like a monty python sketch! I described thepain to myself at the time as what i imagine having a hot tong repeatedly shoved up your bottom would feel like, andmy back felt broken. I cant imagine non back/non induced labour is that bad, but maybe it does depend on the womans mental state a bit too. I was in denial that i was giving birth, which i think added to the nightmare.
 
Thanks for your opinions ladies! Some of your stories have made me feel hopeful that things can be different if I should go on to have another and that the possibility of NOT having backing labour is there. I'm sorry for anyone who has to go through such an excrutiating level of pain. I wouldn't wish it on anyone!

I had a great mental state from start to finish so I know that I couldn't have done anything more in that department. Just really bad luck I guess....:shrug:
 
I hear ya! I had back labor with DD. Never felt any pain in the front, just pain in my lower back and legs. My water broke but contractions wouldn't start, so I was given oxytocin (Pitocin), which is supposed to make pain even worse. I was only 1cm when I got to L&D, so by the time I was 4 cm, it was really painful, so I got the epidural. Sooooo much better. and it sped up the labor, she was born less than 3 hours after I got it (10 hours in total). But overall I enjoyed the labor, so totally ready for another one:thumbup:
 
I had back and front labor. Every contractions started in the front and moved to the back. I would hands down say back labor was by far the worst. I could bare the stomach ones, but the back made me cry, and scream.
 
My first was a back labour. I had constant pain in my back and nowhere else and it was agony! I had all the drugs going and it ended in a csection. My second was back to back but I had no.back pain at all. The pain was a joy on comparison! I got to 6cm with just a tens machine even though contractions were 2 mins apart from the start. Then i did the rest on gas and air.
Back labour was torture in comparison!
 
I had back labour with Logan. I got to 7cm at home, no sleep though just sat in a chair as lying down was horrible. I then had to have drip (oxytocin) as it had been too long between waters breaking and getting to 7cm. OH MY FRIGGING GOD THAT HURT! It got soooo much worse and alll on my back, felt like it was being broken over and over again. Since I had the drip I was bed-bound too cos heartbeat had to be monitored. Felt like it went on forever and only progressed to 8-9cm after HOURS. So had epidural and that was fab. Would go through it all again with this one as the results were awesome :flower:

Im freaking out now that I wont know what labour is like if it happens round the front :dohh:
 
Im freaking out now that I wont know what labour is like if it happens round the front :dohh:

oh, you'll know :lol:

:argh:

on the bright side, back labor is a million times worse, so it wont hurt as baD as that. Plus it's easier to find a position for relief. For me sitting and laying down was the worst feeling on the planet, with my face up birth. but with my face down birth i was able to do so without issues.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,430
Messages
27,150,621
Members
255,846
Latest member
monikabavuro
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"