Is it possible to have 'back labour' and bubs not back to back?

GeorgeyGal

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2010
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
0
Always wondered this, anyone know?

My bubs isnt back to back but have been getting lots of lower back cramps..
 
I've been having a lot too, now progressed to lower.abdomen. but my baby is in perfect position not back.
 
Most of my pains were in my lower back, so I think that's normal and not necessarily the baby back to back.
 
I don't really know for sure but I woke up last night with back pain. It felt like period cramps.
 
I keep getting back pain that then progresses onto cramps in lower tummy like period pains, doesnt mount to much but my little man is def not back to back
 
I had back labor and my daughter wasn't back to back.
 
Doesn't mean the babys back to back it's more the pains you experience and where they are. I had back labour with my son In the first part of it, felt like the kidney pains you get when your on a period for me, strangely no pains on my tummy at all so wasn't sure if I was in labour or not. Midwife said I was 4 cm so definatly the real deal. All changed when I had my waters broke, the tummy contractions were so intense... Epidural was howled for on the following contractions!!
 
I had a back labour with my son and he wasn't back to back, his head was in the wrong position though so that could have caused it. x x x
 
I had NO pain in my bump. It was all in my back and bum. Sofia wasn't back to back... x
 
My mum said she only ever had back labour with all 4 children and none of us were back to back. I think its less common but does happen x
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,210
Messages
27,141,763
Members
255,679
Latest member
mommyfaithh
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->