I really do hope that they bring that option to mums in the US. It often seems to be all or nothing over there. If they had that much safer option, I think alot of mums will take it. Hopefully it could even begin to lead to a decrease in epidural uptake which will inturn decrease c section rates.
Are we really to be put into a situation where it is ok to lord over someone because they have used a different method, rather than doing nothing at all to call it natural - because I don't know many other mammals that drink RLT, pineapple juice, or bounce on sports balls, go to classes on hypnotherapy, yoga, use TENS machines, or land mammals that labour and birth in water, Use massage and essential oils!?! Or have there partners - or anyone present (for that matter) at the birth.
Are you guys fans of "Birth Without Fear" on Facebook? She is really deadset against it, makes for interesting reading...
She claims anyone who uses G&A cannot say that they've had a natural birth. What do you all think of that?
Are you guys fans of "Birth Without Fear" on Facebook? She is really deadset against it, makes for interesting reading...
She claims anyone who uses G&A cannot say that they've had a natural birth. What do you all think of that?
Right, you can't say you had a natural birth because you didn't. It's not natural to use nitrous oxide during labor/birth. A natural birth is one that goes how it's suppose to naturally, without medicaitons, and without interventions. However, whocares? (and that's not ment to be snarky or rude ) Women who are going to use nitrous oxide were probably going to use a different medication instead anyways, so they are more than likely not caring if they have a natural birth or not. I do think sometimes women think that a vaginal birth is what the definition of natural is. But the true definition is a physiological birth that happened spontaneiously without pain medications, augmentation or any other intervention.