SpringCrane
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Messages
- 741
- Reaction score
- 0
I'll preface by saying I'm in the US, and I prefer a midwife for delivery.
I am part of a healthcare plan that has a few different hospital options in my surrounding area. None are in my town, but my two primary choices are about 20 minutes west or 40 minutes east. The closer hospital opened after my son's birth, so having a choice is new.
My prenatal care is split 50/50 OB/midwife. My OB doesn't do hospital rotations, and my midwife does at the hospital that's farther away. However, it's done on a rotating basis, so there's no guarantee who would actually deliver my baby.
I was just informed the closer hospital does not always have a midwife on duty. When in labor, I could call and ask and decide then... however, I labored a long time in the hospital with my son and went through three midwife shifts. So, even if one is on duty when we drive in, there's no guarantee there will still be one on duty for delivery.
The hospital I delivered at before is not only farther distance, but it's often heavy with traffic and construction.
My preference for a midwife-led delivery is to avoid pressure for interventions. However, the first midwife on duty during my son's labor was pushing pitocin (if I didn't progress on her timeframe) and I had to fight for my right to refuse. So, I guess even a midwife delivery isn't a guarantee to be intervention free.
Another plus for the farther hospital is that it has a NICU, not that we have any indication we'll need it, but it is reassuring.
Long post, but I am getting to my point. My last labor started at about 8 pm on a Saturday night with contractions every 8-10 minutes. At 2 am they were 5 minutes apart. By the time I called in, got ready, drove there, etc, it was 5:30 am on Sunday. They were 2-3 minutes apart and intense from then until I delivered at 2:30 am on Monday. I only pushed a few times. I just labored for a long time. I know second deliveries are often faster, but since mine was so long before, even a faster one would likely give us plenty of time to get to the farther hospital, right? I know there's no way to know how any labor and delivery will go, of course.
I'm obviously leaning towards the farther hospital, but I'm wondering if there are any points I'm not considering. Generally policies should be the same since it's the same network (delayed cord clamping, skin to skin, baby stays in room, etc).
I am part of a healthcare plan that has a few different hospital options in my surrounding area. None are in my town, but my two primary choices are about 20 minutes west or 40 minutes east. The closer hospital opened after my son's birth, so having a choice is new.
My prenatal care is split 50/50 OB/midwife. My OB doesn't do hospital rotations, and my midwife does at the hospital that's farther away. However, it's done on a rotating basis, so there's no guarantee who would actually deliver my baby.
I was just informed the closer hospital does not always have a midwife on duty. When in labor, I could call and ask and decide then... however, I labored a long time in the hospital with my son and went through three midwife shifts. So, even if one is on duty when we drive in, there's no guarantee there will still be one on duty for delivery.
The hospital I delivered at before is not only farther distance, but it's often heavy with traffic and construction.
My preference for a midwife-led delivery is to avoid pressure for interventions. However, the first midwife on duty during my son's labor was pushing pitocin (if I didn't progress on her timeframe) and I had to fight for my right to refuse. So, I guess even a midwife delivery isn't a guarantee to be intervention free.
Another plus for the farther hospital is that it has a NICU, not that we have any indication we'll need it, but it is reassuring.
Long post, but I am getting to my point. My last labor started at about 8 pm on a Saturday night with contractions every 8-10 minutes. At 2 am they were 5 minutes apart. By the time I called in, got ready, drove there, etc, it was 5:30 am on Sunday. They were 2-3 minutes apart and intense from then until I delivered at 2:30 am on Monday. I only pushed a few times. I just labored for a long time. I know second deliveries are often faster, but since mine was so long before, even a faster one would likely give us plenty of time to get to the farther hospital, right? I know there's no way to know how any labor and delivery will go, of course.
I'm obviously leaning towards the farther hospital, but I'm wondering if there are any points I'm not considering. Generally policies should be the same since it's the same network (delayed cord clamping, skin to skin, baby stays in room, etc).