- Joined
- Sep 30, 2010
- Messages
- 3,169
- Reaction score
- 1
uncircumsized 

It's pretty common for guys to be circumsized here...I didn't know it was a huge issue until actually reading about it on this forum. I'm going to be 31 years old and have never even seen a uncircumsized penis in person in my lifetime.
It's pretty common for guys to be circumsized here...I didn't know it was a huge issue until actually reading about it on this forum. I'm going to be 31 years old and have never even seen a uncircumsized penis in person in my lifetime.
I must admit I still find myself being surprised when I read about how socially 'normal' it is in other parts of the world. It's just not something that is routinely done in the UK (unless there are parts of the country where ethnic / cultural makeup means it is done more, idk for sure). you learn new things everyday ....
anyway, i'd never consider it, to me its a totally unecessary operation and as my son can't yet decide for himself, I dont feel it would be in his best interests. so unless he develops problems (very unlikely as far as I know) no way. Most dr's (in this country anyway) would go with that viewpoint, as someone else said if it aint broke why fix it ...
I dont know current medical research on it but I would bet that the figures for problems caused purely by keeping a foreskin intact are pretty rare.
Just out of interest (genuinely) someone said their dr told them there were 'health benefit's for circumcision, what are they?
From what i have read nothing that cant be solved by teaching them how to wash propperly and to have safe sex.
unless there is a bloody good medical reason for it, Daniel will remain uncirced
an interesting article by Richard Branson (random I know!)
https://www.virgin.com/richard-bran...-prevent-3-million-deaths-in-the-next-5-years
Male circumcision can prevent 3 million deaths in the next 5 years
There's a way that few people know about that can save millions of lives at next to no cost. That is voluntary medical male circumcision. The bottom line is that it reduces transmission of HIV by 60% in men, the greatest benefits accruing in developing nations that are hardest hit by the epidemic. The World Health Organisation (WHO), UNAIDS and PEPFAR are leading the world in scaling-up circumcision efforts as part of the fight against AIDS.
The WHO estimates that voluntary medical male circumcision could prevent up to 5.7 million new infections and 3 million deaths by 2017, and PEPFAR reports that a programme to increase circumcision to 80% coverage in Eastern and Southern Africa over the next 5 years could prevent 20% - an incredible 4 million new infections in the region.
The effect of male-to-female HIV transmission is less clear and more research is needed. However, studies do show that female partners of circumcised men have a reduced risk of acquiring the virus, and there is consensus that women will benefit from the scale-up of circumcision efforts in the long term because of the lower risk of exposure to HIV as well as sexually transmitted diseases and cervical cancer.
Ideally, men who live in countries with high rates of HIV should be circumcised. It'll save millions of lives and avoid bucket loads of misery.
an interesting article by Richard Branson (random I know!)
https://www.virgin.com/richard-bran...-prevent-3-million-deaths-in-the-next-5-years
Male circumcision can prevent 3 million deaths in the next 5 years
There's a way that few people know about that can save millions of lives at next to no cost. That is voluntary medical male circumcision. The bottom line is that it reduces transmission of HIV by 60% in men, the greatest benefits accruing in developing nations that are hardest hit by the epidemic. The World Health Organisation (WHO), UNAIDS and PEPFAR are leading the world in scaling-up circumcision efforts as part of the fight against AIDS.
The WHO estimates that voluntary medical male circumcision could prevent up to 5.7 million new infections and 3 million deaths by 2017, and PEPFAR reports that a programme to increase circumcision to 80% coverage in Eastern and Southern Africa over the next 5 years could prevent 20% - an incredible 4 million new infections in the region.
The effect of male-to-female HIV transmission is less clear and more research is needed. However, studies do show that female partners of circumcised men have a reduced risk of acquiring the virus, and there is consensus that women will benefit from the scale-up of circumcision efforts in the long term because of the lower risk of exposure to HIV as well as sexually transmitted diseases and cervical cancer.
Ideally, men who live in countries with high rates of HIV should be circumcised. It'll save millions of lives and avoid bucket loads of misery.