Sorry to interrupt your little debate but I thought I'd answer the original question which was, I believe, why did you choose to FF.
I was very lucky in that I never had any issues with LO latching on or feeding, and never had sore nipples or anything like that. I breastfed within an hour of birth and continued to do so for 8 weeks, whilst also giving one bottle a day so DH could help out with feeding as well.
I CHOOSE to FF because I found myself feeding pretty much all day every day. I am a slight control freak, and found that not knowing how much (or little) LO was getting was a real problem. Anytime he cried, I could never totally rule out hunger so ended up offering the boob again just in case he was hungry.
As I was offering one bottle a day as well, I could see the difference in how long he went after a FF compared to a BF. I don't know whether it was supply issues or whether he just took more from the bottle, but he happily went 3 hours after a bottle but only 1.5 to 2 after a BF.
I also didn't like BFing in public. I did it of course, as you can't always avoid it but I never liked doing it. Particulary as my DH plays cricket and football, so I always had to do it in front of all his guy friends which gave them endless amusement.
From a purely selfish point of view, I realised that FFing generally gave me a lot more freedom as I wasn't tied to my LO 24 hours a day. Obviously I love my little boy to death, but I do have other interests in my life and I believe a happy mum = happy baby.
So, to sum up, basically I CHOOSE to FF because it suited both my LO and myself. When I switched to just FFing he ate better, slept better and I loved being able to know exactly how much he was eating. I am obviously aware of the benefits associated with BFing, but I think EBFing my LO would have driven me insane and cannot see how that is better for him than FFing!