Midnight_Fairy
New baby J
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 44,234
- Reaction score
- 5
Extremely worrying
Lau86, that has been my experience of mental health....however, I was employed under the non-nhs service.
Originally, the IAPT service was a consortium between the NHS and 5 mental health charities. It worked incredibly well as we had a lot of different services (Employment support, drug & alcohol etc) that we could refer to directly. We covered 4 ccgs and had 20+ therapists covering each area. Patients were waiting between 1 & 4 weeks from referral.
After Conservatives came in, they introduced AQP (Any Qualified Provider.) The service had to split up and put in a bid each to continue with IAPT separately. The funding wasn't viable for any of the services. Over night, we went from having 20+ staff in each ccg to 15 staff covering all 4 ccg.
We had a penalty to pay every time we didn't meet targets (no service ever managed to hit the targets.) A year later, funding was cut even further and higher penalties was introduced.
It was no longer patient focused as the service couldn't afford to be. Limits on how many sessions a patient could have came into force.
As we were no longer working with the NHS, we lost the direct referral route to Secondary Care...so anyone needing immediate mental health support had to go back to the GP and ask for referral (just what a person in crisis needs!)
AQP is where the NHS is going and it's not good way to go. Services will go under, the care required will not be given purely because the funding is not there.
As I said before, they have closed 2 hospitals (including Minor Injuries department), closed one walk in centre (none of the GP surgeries provide out of hours services) and in the midst of closing the last one.
A&E is now at breaking point as where people would normally go to the other places, they can't. It's all well and good saying "don't go to A&E unless it's an emergency" but if you require medical attention and there is literally no where else to attend...what are you supposed to do?
Whereas my village has had a brand new state of the art health village opened including same day appointments (similar to a walk in service), GP practice, fully stocked pharmacy and maternity services. It's 10miles from the nearest A&E hospital, of where there was a new cardiac unit opened which is one of the best in the country. So I've seen money being spent where necessary.
In regards to patient transport, I was offered ambulances home after every single scan appointment and reduced movement ctgs. I had 9 different trips into the maternity department outside of my regular community visits. I was single and always on my own but I absolutely do not see that as a reason to be offering me a lift home (2 of which were at 10pm). I refused every time, and told them to stop attempting to waste money, I drove but there was no reason I wouldn't have been able to get a taxi and/or bus.
So I've definitely seen money being spent, and also wasted.
It don't think there's anything wrong with abolishing an Act that lets foreign criminals and terrorists live amoungst us as they have a 'right to family life', and being so controlled by Europe that our Supreme Court stands for nothing.
It will be replaced with a different bill (British Bill of Rights) but criminals will be kicked out and have limited appeal efforts, judgements made by British judges will not be allowed to be overruled by Europe.
Icklemonster, my experience of privatisation is not that there will be an increase in funding or an increase in care.
Before privatision is fully considered, I'd rather they look at the huge waste of money they spend.
Midnight, they have proposed a number of windfarms around here but there is a large amount opposition from residents. I'm not sure why, I quite like them.
They built some off shore not that long ago. My only gripe with it was they were built and imported from France. There is a steelworks with the capabilities to make them one mile away from the site they were built. That to me is completely wrong.