You aren't the only person here ticking.clock, there are a lot of girls here "on the fence" who still believe that formula is equal in terms of ingredients or who believe Aptamil is the "closest to break milk" because of advertising.
You aren't the only person here ticking.clock, there are a lot of girls here "on the fence" who still believe that formula is equal in terms of ingredients or who believe Aptamil is the "closest to break milk" because of advertising.
You aren't the only person here ticking.clock, there are a lot of girls here "on the fence" who still believe that formula is equal in terms of ingredients or who believe Aptamil is the "closest to break milk" because of advertising.
Surely aptamil or any other formula is 'closet to breast milk' because its either BF or FF therefore FF is the only other thing to breast milk. Therefore I do agree with that statement. It wouldn't be allowed otherwise. Weather you agree or not it's the only alternative to breast milk therefore it's got to the closet available. It never mentions being the same.
You aren't the only person here ticking.clock, there are a lot of girls here "on the fence" who still believe that formula is equal in terms of ingredients or who believe Aptamil is the "closest to break milk" because of advertising.
Surely aptamil or any other formula is 'closet to breast milk' because its either BF or FF therefore FF is the only other thing to breast milk. Therefore I do agree with that statement. It wouldn't be allowed otherwise. Weather you agree or not it's the only alternative to breast milk therefore it's got to the closet available. It never mentions being the same.
It isn't allowed. It was banned and they got in trouble.
Formula is nothing like breast milk and no brand is closer then any other.
You aren't the only person here ticking.clock, there are a lot of girls here "on the fence" who still believe that formula is equal in terms of ingredients or who believe Aptamil is the "closest to break milk" because of advertising.
Surely aptamil or any other formula is 'closet to breast milk' because its either BF or FF therefore FF is the only other thing to breast milk. Therefore I do agree with that statement. It wouldn't be allowed otherwise. Weather you agree or not it's the only alternative to breast milk therefore it's got to the closet available. It never mentions being the same.
Your missing my point.......
I'm not against BF or FF, I have said that the BEST feeding method is one that makes mum and baby happy, but the info for BOTH should be given
Not missing the point, I don't think. Just don't agree. The BEST source of food and comfort and immune support for a baby is to be breast fed. This is true whether mom is happy with that or not. Some women aren't able or don't want to do that and that is their choice. An alternative exists that means these kids get nutrition that is not too bad and most get by just fine with it. There are health costs to babies and even some deaths (this has recently been quantified in a study) but for the vast majority it is fine.
I get what you are saying and understand you but honestly the increased pushing of breast feeding is, in many cases helpful.
Health care providers in baby friendly hospitals definitely help with ffing once bfing has been tried if it means baby is not thriving without supplementation. They just don't discuss it as an option before bfing has even been attempted (even just a day of bfing is beneficial)
We aren't surprised when docs etc don't provide you info on smoking or drinking as choice to deal with stress but they will help you quit. Choosing to smoke when stressed is a choice many people make And they feel it helps them but it doesn't mean we can or should promote cigs for relaxation or have docs suggest this and discuss this option to healthy non smokers. This may sound like a silly comparison but in my grand Mother's time her doc DID encourage her to smoke for her nerves. Times change as we get more info on risks and benefits.
sorry but my mum did not BF any of her 4 children because she didnt 'feel right' now each to their own feeling and never in my life would i judge her or belittle her (or anyone else for that matter) for not wanting to BF... Back then it was looked upon very differently... very sad but true~!It terms of advertising, I think it is about eduction. People who were FF are more likely to FF and maybe never consider BF because FF is what they know. By putting Breast is best out there and getting MWs to talk about it, then it is helping to educate and break the cycle.
I maybe wrong but I think BF rates have increased a lot since the changes in advertising and education around BF.
its not just making up a bottle that people want help and support with though! its the fact that they are new to a responsibility of feeding a baby whether it is FF or BF they may want some support and advice on how to do this. especially if they mentally are not coping with becoming a new mum very well in the early days and are feeling very low and not feeling a bond with their baby xxEven a first time mum can work out how to FF- the MW wont point blank refuse to help but they dont need special training or anything. You just read the tin. I was nervous with my first but its fine once you have made a bottle etc its fine.
You aren't the only person here ticking.clock, there are a lot of girls here "on the fence" who still believe that formula is equal in terms of ingredients or who believe Aptamil is the "closest to break milk" because of advertising.
Surely aptamil or any other formula is 'closet to breast milk' because its either BF or FF therefore FF is the only other thing to breast milk. Therefore I do agree with that statement. It wouldn't be allowed otherwise. Weather you agree or not it's the only alternative to breast milk therefore it's got to the closet available. It never mentions being the same.
I think the point there was referencing claims that formula manufacturers used to put on packaging - Aptamil specifically put that they were 'closest to breast milk' on their packaging. Other companies put different things. The article below (Daily Mail, 2007, when companies were banned from putting nutritional claims on formula packaging) gives some examples of the things companies used to say to make consumers favour their product more than their competitors.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-441566/Baby-milk-firms-told-drop-nutrition-claims.html
In response to your second postpersonally, I'd say that formula is 'the best alternative' to breast milk rather than 'the closest thing to'.
Where I live everyone assumes you'll formula feed. In hospitals they even give out a "breastfeeding sample bag" which has nothing to do with breastfeeding. It has formula, bottles and formula coupons. Formula companies cannot advertise on TV in my state, so they advertise in parenting magazines and hospitals. Also formula companies have to have "breastmilk is best" on their cans, they don't put in on there because they believe in it.
I can't believe that this has been going on for days! Surely we have enough stresses in everyday life without spending time debating on the net?!