Mommy's Angel
Mommy to Angelboy 10/22/9
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 3,169
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi ladies,
Well, I "think" todays scan was a good one. Lizzie, maybe you can elaborate a bit on it.
Cervical length went from an even 2.0 from time of stitch and is now 2.4. So sounds like bed rest is working even though we're seeing slightly more cervical length.
Funneling is still there but hasn't really gotten worse. Measurement from stitch to funneling was 1.3cm's and from the stitch outward there's still 1.2cm's left as well. They seem to think it was good. I wasn't sure about the length from funneling to stitch. I suppose since she's not down to the stitch it's a good sign right??
Then she did an in-depth look of the heart. She was able to see it all and said SHE didn't see the Ventricular Septal Defect. She said she there was a VERY small area that was dark that "could" be a hole but she didn't think it was. She said we would most likely have to go back to the cardiologist but she didn't see it. When we got her report at the actual Perinatal Center, the report said everything including the heart was fine and nothing abnormal was found. So right now I'm thinking positive unless told differently. In this case, the hole would be so minimal that it will likely close on it's own if this is what it is.
No swelling, nothing much else really going on. Amelia is moving like crazy today and I did have a contraction while she was pressing down so hard with the sonogram. I'm told that's fine as long as it's not a whole lot of contractions in an hours time. The 17P seems to be working there as well.
All in all, this is the second of two very good reports from the sonographer and Perinatologist.
Another question I have for you Lizzie... I'll be 23wks on Sunday and they said they don't do anymore cervical length exams after wk 24 but they'll check it again in 5 wks when I have another anomaly scan. Is this the norm or should I be pushing for bi-weekly scans to check the stitch and length.
They said they don't like to mess too much with mass internal scans in correlation to the IC. I think I may have heard that said in here as well but wanted to make sure that's the norm or if I should push for the scans bi-weekly?
Love to you all!!
Well, I "think" todays scan was a good one. Lizzie, maybe you can elaborate a bit on it.
Cervical length went from an even 2.0 from time of stitch and is now 2.4. So sounds like bed rest is working even though we're seeing slightly more cervical length.
Funneling is still there but hasn't really gotten worse. Measurement from stitch to funneling was 1.3cm's and from the stitch outward there's still 1.2cm's left as well. They seem to think it was good. I wasn't sure about the length from funneling to stitch. I suppose since she's not down to the stitch it's a good sign right??
Then she did an in-depth look of the heart. She was able to see it all and said SHE didn't see the Ventricular Septal Defect. She said she there was a VERY small area that was dark that "could" be a hole but she didn't think it was. She said we would most likely have to go back to the cardiologist but she didn't see it. When we got her report at the actual Perinatal Center, the report said everything including the heart was fine and nothing abnormal was found. So right now I'm thinking positive unless told differently. In this case, the hole would be so minimal that it will likely close on it's own if this is what it is.

No swelling, nothing much else really going on. Amelia is moving like crazy today and I did have a contraction while she was pressing down so hard with the sonogram. I'm told that's fine as long as it's not a whole lot of contractions in an hours time. The 17P seems to be working there as well.
All in all, this is the second of two very good reports from the sonographer and Perinatologist.
Another question I have for you Lizzie... I'll be 23wks on Sunday and they said they don't do anymore cervical length exams after wk 24 but they'll check it again in 5 wks when I have another anomaly scan. Is this the norm or should I be pushing for bi-weekly scans to check the stitch and length.
They said they don't like to mess too much with mass internal scans in correlation to the IC. I think I may have heard that said in here as well but wanted to make sure that's the norm or if I should push for the scans bi-weekly?
Love to you all!!