xxCarolinexx
Mark & Carla's Mammy
- Joined
- May 20, 2009
- Messages
- 320
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi All,
I've just been reading keldac's thread about "the importance of reduced fetal movements" and it kinda scared me a bit
So I guees I'm looking for a bit of reassurance...
I'm pregnant with a baby girl and she's not a very active baby (unlike my son when I was pregnant with him a few years ago). She does move around a bit - just not a LOT! She'll sometimes be moving around for a good few minutes at a time. But then it'll go a few hours with very little activity from her. Again, I'm basically comparing this to the last time I was pregnant (where he was a very active baby for the most part)!
I know every baby is different and if I'm ever worried, I just have to touch my belly a little and it will always trigger movements from her. So I know she responds to touch
I had a scan only last week and heartbeat sounded fine to me. Nice and strong. HOWEVER, it was a 3d scan so I kinda have this thing in my head that because it wasn't actually a "medical" scan as such, that maybe the doctor wouldn't have been looking out for anything unusual medically..? (On the brochure, it states something along the lines of: "this scan is not intended for medical purposes and you should still attend for scan with your hospital").
I'm probably just being silly but it's freaking me out ever since I read that thread today
And at the same time I'm wondering if it's all in my head
Right from the start of the pregnancy I've been thinking it was too good to be true as I had 2 miscarriages before I had my son (both early on, under 12 weeks). So this time around, I was almost expecting something to go wrong because of what I've been through before. I just keep thinking that I can't be lucky enough to have a straight forward pregnancy without any heartache first?!
I have a check-up with my GP tomorrow so I'll probably mention it to her just in case (but I hope I won't sound silly or like I'm over-reacting).
Anyways, sorry for such a long post but I'd appreciate any advice or reassurance you can give me on this. Is anyone else pregnant with a not-very-active little one? Has anyone already sought advice about the same thing? Or are there any mothers who have had a previous pregnancies where baby wasn't overly active in the womb?
Basically, should I be worried? It's not like there WAS LOADZ of movement and THEN NONE. There just isn't loads of movement to begin with. Could baby just be a little lazy? lol
Thanks everyone

I've just been reading keldac's thread about "the importance of reduced fetal movements" and it kinda scared me a bit

I'm pregnant with a baby girl and she's not a very active baby (unlike my son when I was pregnant with him a few years ago). She does move around a bit - just not a LOT! She'll sometimes be moving around for a good few minutes at a time. But then it'll go a few hours with very little activity from her. Again, I'm basically comparing this to the last time I was pregnant (where he was a very active baby for the most part)!

I know every baby is different and if I'm ever worried, I just have to touch my belly a little and it will always trigger movements from her. So I know she responds to touch

I had a scan only last week and heartbeat sounded fine to me. Nice and strong. HOWEVER, it was a 3d scan so I kinda have this thing in my head that because it wasn't actually a "medical" scan as such, that maybe the doctor wouldn't have been looking out for anything unusual medically..? (On the brochure, it states something along the lines of: "this scan is not intended for medical purposes and you should still attend for scan with your hospital").
I'm probably just being silly but it's freaking me out ever since I read that thread today


I have a check-up with my GP tomorrow so I'll probably mention it to her just in case (but I hope I won't sound silly or like I'm over-reacting).
Anyways, sorry for such a long post but I'd appreciate any advice or reassurance you can give me on this. Is anyone else pregnant with a not-very-active little one? Has anyone already sought advice about the same thing? Or are there any mothers who have had a previous pregnancies where baby wasn't overly active in the womb?
Basically, should I be worried? It's not like there WAS LOADZ of movement and THEN NONE. There just isn't loads of movement to begin with. Could baby just be a little lazy? lol
Thanks everyone

