spunky84
TTC #4
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2012
- Messages
- 2,636
- Reaction score
- 2
LO was born with a large birthmark on her leg. During her first visit with the pediatrician, she had us schedule her an appt with a dermatologist.
She was about 2 weeks when she saw the first dermatologist. He said it was non-cancerous but could, at some point, become cancerous. He said that she could have it removed for cosmetic reasons once she's a teenager...
That wasn't good enough for me & I discussed it with her pediatrician. Her pediatrician wasn't really satisfied with it either and was on the same page as me with wanting to get it removed sooner than later (for my own piece of mind and for LO's benefit).
We finally had her second opinion appt today - this time with a pediatric dermatologist (I didn't know that there was a specialty in pediatrics!).
The birthmark grew .5 - 1 cm since she was 2 1/2 weeks old. Her birthmark is 4cm in length which puts it in the "medium" category which also means that she's at higher risk of it being cancerous vs if it were under 2 cm.
DH and I discussed it before the appt, so I was able to tell her that we're going ahead with it. I asked if she should any older and she said that it's already grown that much since she was 2 weeks and they don't want to wait too long to remove it. She was actually appalled at the other derm's assessment (waiting for her to be a teenager and for cosmetic reasons).
She has to go for a biopsy on January 9th. That way if there are any abnormal cells, the surgeon will know if he needs to extend the margins.
I'm doing the worst thing I can do right now by googling, but I did find something interesting.
Superficial Spreading Melanoma. Which they say accounts for 70% of melanomas, which is also the most common and most curable. The description match LO's perfectly & it even said that in women it's usually located on the back of the leg, which is exactly where LO's is.
I don't want to have to put her through surgery at such a young age, but after reading that especially, I feel like it's definitely the right thing.
I'm scared out of my mind though. I feel like January cannot come fast enough. I remember when I first saw it after she was born. My heart sank and automatically worried that it was something. Everyone else just kept harping on how big it was (which annoyed the crap out of me).
I'm just praying that it's benign and that removing it will just fix it all together.
Has anyone been through anything like this with their LO? How was the surgery and recovery? Did it resolve things or did you still find anything new cropping up? How do you deal with such a little, innocent baby going through that?
I'm sure it's not invasive, but still, it's so hard to imagine putting her through this and the potential alternative of not going through with it.
She was about 2 weeks when she saw the first dermatologist. He said it was non-cancerous but could, at some point, become cancerous. He said that she could have it removed for cosmetic reasons once she's a teenager...
That wasn't good enough for me & I discussed it with her pediatrician. Her pediatrician wasn't really satisfied with it either and was on the same page as me with wanting to get it removed sooner than later (for my own piece of mind and for LO's benefit).
We finally had her second opinion appt today - this time with a pediatric dermatologist (I didn't know that there was a specialty in pediatrics!).
The birthmark grew .5 - 1 cm since she was 2 1/2 weeks old. Her birthmark is 4cm in length which puts it in the "medium" category which also means that she's at higher risk of it being cancerous vs if it were under 2 cm.
DH and I discussed it before the appt, so I was able to tell her that we're going ahead with it. I asked if she should any older and she said that it's already grown that much since she was 2 weeks and they don't want to wait too long to remove it. She was actually appalled at the other derm's assessment (waiting for her to be a teenager and for cosmetic reasons).
She has to go for a biopsy on January 9th. That way if there are any abnormal cells, the surgeon will know if he needs to extend the margins.
I'm doing the worst thing I can do right now by googling, but I did find something interesting.
Superficial Spreading Melanoma. Which they say accounts for 70% of melanomas, which is also the most common and most curable. The description match LO's perfectly & it even said that in women it's usually located on the back of the leg, which is exactly where LO's is.
I don't want to have to put her through surgery at such a young age, but after reading that especially, I feel like it's definitely the right thing.
I'm scared out of my mind though. I feel like January cannot come fast enough. I remember when I first saw it after she was born. My heart sank and automatically worried that it was something. Everyone else just kept harping on how big it was (which annoyed the crap out of me).
I'm just praying that it's benign and that removing it will just fix it all together.
Has anyone been through anything like this with their LO? How was the surgery and recovery? Did it resolve things or did you still find anything new cropping up? How do you deal with such a little, innocent baby going through that?
I'm sure it's not invasive, but still, it's so hard to imagine putting her through this and the potential alternative of not going through with it.