• Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Nub Experts...Is this marked one is boy nub

ranga_srini_s

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hi all,

Could anyone confirm the marked ones are boy nub from my 12W & 16W scan images.

thanks,
 

Attachments

  • 12W - Nub marking.jpg
    12W - Nub marking.jpg
    24.9 KB · Views: 29
  • 16W- Nub marking.jpg
    16W- Nub marking.jpg
    23.2 KB · Views: 29
Hmmm I can't see the folk so my guess is boy. However, the angle is not typically male.
 
Hmmm I can't see the folk so my guess is boy. However, the angle is not typically male.

Yes the both scan images are same. 1st is at 12 week & 2nd is at 16 Week. Do u see huge difference between both?

thanks,
 
Hmmm I can't see the folk so my guess is boy. However, the angle is not typically male.

Yes the both scan images are same. 1st is at 12 week & 2nd is at 16 Week. Do u see huge difference between both?

thanks,

There isn't a big difference no. The first image to me looks like a boy (only just) but still is not typically the male genital angle and there doesn't seem to be a folk either. Second scan is 50/50 I'm insure if there is a folk like image as the red line interferes a bit but the angle is again not typically male and if I had to put money on this image alone I would say girl (sorry)
 
hi rosaphene2,

thanks for your prediction. Is your prediction based on Nub or Skull??

thanks again.
 
Hmmm I can't see the folk so my guess is boy. However, the angle is not typically male.

Yes the both scan images are same. 1st is at 12 week & 2nd is at 16 Week. Do u see huge difference between both?

thanks,

There isn't a big difference no. The first image to me looks like a boy (only just) but still is not typically the male genital angle and there doesn't seem to be a folk either. Second scan is 50/50 I'm insure if there is a folk like image as the red line interferes a bit but the angle is again not typically male and if I had to put money on this image alone I would say girl (sorry)

Hi Mrsb3 ,

Pls find attached original image without marking. Could u guess now?

thanks,
 

Attachments

  • 16W-nub.jpg
    16W-nub.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 11
Hmmm I can't see the folk so my guess is boy. However, the angle is not typically male.

Yes the both scan images are same. 1st is at 12 week & 2nd is at 16 Week. Do u see huge difference between both?

thanks,

There isn't a big difference no. The first image to me looks like a boy (only just) but still is not typically the male genital angle and there doesn't seem to be a folk either. Second scan is 50/50 I'm insure if there is a folk like image as the red line interferes a bit but the angle is again not typically male and if I had to put money on this image alone I would say girl (sorry)

Hi Mrsb3 ,

Pls find attached original image without marking. Could u guess now?

thanks,

Yes, much clearer- i am 90% sure it's a girl. Sorry if you didn't want to hear this. I have had 2 boys and a girl and guessed all mine correctly at their 12 week scan based on the nub. Don't forget to post back here after your 20wk scan to see who was right. GL
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,357
Messages
27,147,442
Members
255,798
Latest member
mamaof2_2020
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->