summer2011
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2011
- Messages
- 670
- Reaction score
- 0
I know there is a thread started for incompetent cervix already but nothing specific to ladies who have had a cone biopsy.
I've been referred to a high risk ob since 13 weeks and my initial cervical checks were fine (although doc said at that early stage it was hard to distinguish cervix from the bottom of the uterus which could throw off measurements.
Yesterday at just 17 weeks I measured just under 2.5, either 2.39 or 2.47 (she's looking at 2.5 cm in a 'normal' length cervix.
Anyone had similar measurements at just 17 weeks?
She's scheduled another scan in a weeks time to see if the prog and rest help stop any further shortening. Can't bare the thought of a late miscarriage or a very early premie![Cry :cry: :cry:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/cry.gif)
I've been referred to a high risk ob since 13 weeks and my initial cervical checks were fine (although doc said at that early stage it was hard to distinguish cervix from the bottom of the uterus which could throw off measurements.
Yesterday at just 17 weeks I measured just under 2.5, either 2.39 or 2.47 (she's looking at 2.5 cm in a 'normal' length cervix.
Anyone had similar measurements at just 17 weeks?
She's scheduled another scan in a weeks time to see if the prog and rest help stop any further shortening. Can't bare the thought of a late miscarriage or a very early premie
![Cry :cry: :cry:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/cry.gif)