really a girl?

[Eleanor ace]

I can see what you mean there, but I think because it is in front of the front leg (rather then between the legs) it couldn't be genitals. I know that scan images can be a bit distorted though so you never know. But the gender shot looks so clear that I would think it must be a girl. Were you hoping for a boy? There's a lovely little community in the Gender Disappointment section (access by request) on here with other women who've experienced doubt over their gender scans if you wanted people to talk to (sorry if I've read the situation wrong!) x

 

[Pearls18]

When it's a boy it's very obvious by 20 weeks, with both of my boys the tech didn't even say the word boy they just showed me as it was quite apparent! Hope you're ok.

 

[Harley Quinn]

I see what you mean, but I agree with Eleanor that it looks like that bit is in front of the leg, not in between.

And it's worth it to chat with someone, either here or irl, if you are even a little disappointed about the gender. I've been there, and it surprised me how much it affected me. Talking it out definitely helped!

 

[Babee_Bugs]

Looks exactly like my Little girls potty shot...

when i was having my sons, i didn't even need the tech to tell me, you could see it floating about the screen pmsl...

 

[cupcakekate]

pretty sure thats a girl!