Kelly9
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2009
- Messages
- 33,267
- Reaction score
- 0
Sounds like great news to me Georgia!
Oh and I found out something interesting according to WHO (world health organization) they have changed how they measure morphology (on the kruger scale) and are more strict so when I posted that my hubby's morphology dropped from 11% to 2% I thought his sperm just got worse but with his old SA's when he had 11% morphology anything %15 and higher was good. But now with the new standards you need to have %5 or greater. So my hubby's morphology is a bit lower then normal with this last SA but it's no where near as bad as I thought originally! Got to take whatever victory I can.
Oh and I found out something interesting according to WHO (world health organization) they have changed how they measure morphology (on the kruger scale) and are more strict so when I posted that my hubby's morphology dropped from 11% to 2% I thought his sperm just got worse but with his old SA's when he had 11% morphology anything %15 and higher was good. But now with the new standards you need to have %5 or greater. So my hubby's morphology is a bit lower then normal with this last SA but it's no where near as bad as I thought originally! Got to take whatever victory I can.