NovemberRayne
TTC #1
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Messages
- 438
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi ladies.. I have a worry when it comes to TTC with my partner and I just wanted a few opinions on the situation.
We've started the ball rolling in regards to being treated at a clinic, we've been approved and everything, just sorting out the millions of blood tests before starting. Our friend, a single gay man intends to donate to the clinic for us, with the intent of a sibling in the future.
Our friend, let's call him J, doesn't want to be a full time parent, or pay maintence, he just wants to be able to see any resulting child. He understands that we will be the parents in all senses of the word but he would have more like an uncle role (although we wont hide who he really is)
Now, he's mentioned to us that he wants to be named on the birth certificate as the childs father, but happy for us to give our child my partners surname (as I'll be taking hers when we CP) and said he's happy to let my partner adopt.
My partner and I will be funding the costs for the ENTIRE treatment, even down to the tests J will need will need bloods/sperm. If we're lucky enough to concieve, it will my partner holding my hand at every appointment, she'll be my constant support, there at the birth & taking us home. J lives very far from us so couldn't be there even if he wanted to.
I feel bad for thinking it as I love all parties involved, but I feel more and more that it's unfair for my partner to be the legal 3rd wheel, after all the money we'll put in on treatment, we'll have to spend again on adoption and if we get an unsympathetic court, they may refuse her adopting, I'm not sure I want to take that risk when she will be, from he moment of conception, that child's second parent.
As I understand it, once a person is adopted a new certificate is issued anyway which wouldnt have 'fathers' name listed and would be used in place of a birth certificate... His name and 'parental responsibility' would be gone, so why not just have my partner named on the birth certificate from the outset. I don't want to upset either of them & I see both views but I'm swaying in the favour of my partner - and to make sure that things are in place in a agreement that secures J access now and in the event that something (god forbid) should happen to us.
I do want to speak with J on this, but I just wanted some external opinions on if what I'm thinking is fair before I do.. If we lose him as a donor, it would be very sad for all involved on a personal level... But I do understand that if he wants to continue, we'll definitely need to seek legal advice.
Thanks for baring with me xxxx
We've started the ball rolling in regards to being treated at a clinic, we've been approved and everything, just sorting out the millions of blood tests before starting. Our friend, a single gay man intends to donate to the clinic for us, with the intent of a sibling in the future.
Our friend, let's call him J, doesn't want to be a full time parent, or pay maintence, he just wants to be able to see any resulting child. He understands that we will be the parents in all senses of the word but he would have more like an uncle role (although we wont hide who he really is)
Now, he's mentioned to us that he wants to be named on the birth certificate as the childs father, but happy for us to give our child my partners surname (as I'll be taking hers when we CP) and said he's happy to let my partner adopt.
My partner and I will be funding the costs for the ENTIRE treatment, even down to the tests J will need will need bloods/sperm. If we're lucky enough to concieve, it will my partner holding my hand at every appointment, she'll be my constant support, there at the birth & taking us home. J lives very far from us so couldn't be there even if he wanted to.
I feel bad for thinking it as I love all parties involved, but I feel more and more that it's unfair for my partner to be the legal 3rd wheel, after all the money we'll put in on treatment, we'll have to spend again on adoption and if we get an unsympathetic court, they may refuse her adopting, I'm not sure I want to take that risk when she will be, from he moment of conception, that child's second parent.
As I understand it, once a person is adopted a new certificate is issued anyway which wouldnt have 'fathers' name listed and would be used in place of a birth certificate... His name and 'parental responsibility' would be gone, so why not just have my partner named on the birth certificate from the outset. I don't want to upset either of them & I see both views but I'm swaying in the favour of my partner - and to make sure that things are in place in a agreement that secures J access now and in the event that something (god forbid) should happen to us.
I do want to speak with J on this, but I just wanted some external opinions on if what I'm thinking is fair before I do.. If we lose him as a donor, it would be very sad for all involved on a personal level... But I do understand that if he wants to continue, we'll definitely need to seek legal advice.
Thanks for baring with me xxxx