indigo_fairy
Mum of 2
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 478
- Reaction score
- 0
My MW is fully supportive now, but wasn't when I first spoke about it to her, my consultant has 'strongly advised against it', but only on the grounds of uterine rupture (get used to hearing that mentioned ALOT lol), whereas the chances of that happening are 0.5%, its a bigger risk (1%) for cord prolapse for example but he's never once mentioned that?
It really pees me off when they manipulate statistics for their own good
I also think that if other hospitals are like my local one, who feel it's appropriate to give a VBAC woman induction drugs (totally bonkers btw), which vastly increases their change of rupture... then that statistic of 0.5% is probably a lot lower for HBACs where you haven't taken any induction-type medications
Definitely the stats must be from mainly hospital births. Not to mention the length of time since you had the CS? It's surely going to differ for each individual don't you think? I don't understand the giving of induction drugs to VBAC's whatsoever, there are so many alternatives! the mind boggles...