Jules, I am SO sorry about your loss.

I can't imagine what you have been through, and I totally agree, doctors and technicians need to be much more careful in watching for this kind of diagnosis. Thank you for sharing your story and concern. I agree, if I am not 100 percent certain on my diagnosis, I am going to PUSH for a c-section. It is not my first choice, considering I had 2 vaginal births to big babies, but I do NOT want to lose my child at all and will do all that I can to prevent it. I also want to do what I can to let other people know about the risks, it is honestly something I've never heard about.
Henergy, I am doing alright, had my ultrasound yesterday. I am very grateful that the technician that I had helping the other tech (there was 1 to begin with, but she was having difficulty locating my vessels etc so had to bring another tech in with her) is NOT my doctor, or the one diagnosing this. The techs take all the pictures and paperwork to the ultrasound doctor for diagnosing conditions. If the pictures are not clear enough or don't show what they need to see, I'll get called in again (I'm pretty sure I will either way to monitor everything). They found I DO have a Velamentous Cord Insertion for certain, and that my complete placenta previa has moved (by how much I am not sure) but now the placenta has developed a succenturiate lobe, though it's location I don't know, but this also increases risk of rupture if a vaginal delivery were to occur. The vessels themselves branch off, one going away from my uterine wall and into the placenta, the others traveling down my uterine wall and "beside" my cervix but not directly across the cervical opening itself, and into my placenta. The tech didn't treat this as priority, while the other one really wanted to get more pictures and he wouldn't let her. It was frustrating to say the least. So now I await Tuesday to find out what the ultrasound doctor says in his report for my actual diagnosis. Fingers crossed they will let me know what is going on, because I do not want to wait to get a plan in place if at all possible.
I'm really sorry Henergy that you have to wait another 3 weeks to see if you can find more out!!! I am going to be posting on the BabyCenter site too regarding this to get some more info. I think that if the vessels are directly beside the cervical opening, it was pretty darn close to being VP, but I'm not a doctor and that's just my opinion. Even if it is not true VP, or a classic case of it, it is still a huge issue to be that close to the cervical opening in case of my water breaking. Fingers crossed for both of us to get a clear answer soon!!!