Lane_Meyer
1st child
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all, and welcome to beanhopes and bbaby. It's really nice to have so many join- thank you Lauren for getting us together.
Bbaby, I too have had losses (two) but both were early. I had one at 7 weeks in the summer and it was then that they identified a large (8cm) pedunculated fibroid (this means it's on a stalk) growing out of the back of my uterus, plus two small ones. 3 specialists said it was unlikely the fibroid caused the loss. I had a lot of cramping from conception until the m/c, but again people can experience this and carry to term. Anyway my second loss was at 4 weeks (period came on time) so I think that was probably a chemical pregnancy (no implantation.)
I considered surgery very carefully but 2 of the specialists said they strongly advised against, due to the possibility of damage to the uterus and even hysterectomy due to the removal of the fibroids. I am now 20 weeks pregnant and I am feeling good about my chances, as is my obgyn. The 8cm fibroid and one small one have stayed the same, while a small one near my cervix has grown to 10cm. This will probably mean a c-section - this sounds like what you have beanhopes? My obgyn is not worried about possible m/c / preterm birth (and that fibroid is big!!!) and I have to trust that all will be well, since there is nothing I can do either way.
I guess what dh and I decided was that we will try once more and see what happens before looking at our options. good luck to you no matter what you decide
Bbaby, I too have had losses (two) but both were early. I had one at 7 weeks in the summer and it was then that they identified a large (8cm) pedunculated fibroid (this means it's on a stalk) growing out of the back of my uterus, plus two small ones. 3 specialists said it was unlikely the fibroid caused the loss. I had a lot of cramping from conception until the m/c, but again people can experience this and carry to term. Anyway my second loss was at 4 weeks (period came on time) so I think that was probably a chemical pregnancy (no implantation.)
I considered surgery very carefully but 2 of the specialists said they strongly advised against, due to the possibility of damage to the uterus and even hysterectomy due to the removal of the fibroids. I am now 20 weeks pregnant and I am feeling good about my chances, as is my obgyn. The 8cm fibroid and one small one have stayed the same, while a small one near my cervix has grown to 10cm. This will probably mean a c-section - this sounds like what you have beanhopes? My obgyn is not worried about possible m/c / preterm birth (and that fibroid is big!!!) and I have to trust that all will be well, since there is nothing I can do either way.
I guess what dh and I decided was that we will try once more and see what happens before looking at our options. good luck to you no matter what you decide