Nibblenic
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 9,267
- Reaction score
- 0
I was watching Jo Frosts new show last week. I was genuinely shocked by a statement that said we're only spending 49 minutes a day as a family.
Now I imediately thought well thats not me/us. So i went of to find that this is actually a reseach from about a year ago
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/7760585/Family-life-squeezed-into-49-minutes-a-day.html
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8703010.stm
Now by this surverys deffintion 'family time' is pretty much as a whole family. Actually doing something together and focused on eachother. Then all of a sudden 49 minutes (during the week) became very real.
A break down of our evening.
5pm oh arrives home play with lo. I however cook so we're not 'together'
5:30pm we do sit down as a family and eat. 20 mintues 'family time'6pm. Lo goes in the bath OH watches/plays with her. I tidy up
6:30pm into Pjs and start of bedtime. I come up for 10 minutes help with teeth brshing and bring milk 10 minutes family time.
Thats it really, 30 minutes Mon-fri, I was pretty shocked.
Now on the weekends we are always at a park/museum/NTsite/swimming/ farm. So I would say here are at least 3-4 hours per day where it is just us being together doing something then plus our normal night time routine.
I would say obviously becase i am now a sahm I spend a lot more time with her than 49 minutes. Even between naps and cleaning etc. However only 6% felt they needed more time with mum.
I would say we go out a lot more than the average family. It does cost some money but because we have passes for most of these places its not like paying out every weekend just once a year and obviously parks/walks are free.
The survey also pointed out that children were wanting to spend time in the house doing things a a family. Now most of the time Lo is at home on a weekend she is asleep as she still has a 3 hour mid-day nap. But when we are not out and she is not asleep. Me and Oh tend to take it in turns to look after her, as one of us is normally cooking/cleaning/sorting something. Now im not sayng we dont spend time together but in the house but its minutes rather than hours of concentrated play. Not just happening to being within 5 metres of eachother
I dont think this makes anyone a better or worse parent I was simply suprised by how little time mon-fri we actually spent completly together focusing on Lo/eachother
I still think we spend 'enough' time as a family we deffinately have a good bond and get along and work together well. In an ideal world we would be rich and OH wouldnt have to work and we could be together everyday, but that is near enough no ones reality.
So my question; Can anyone really find more than 1 hour in a day to concentrate on being a family unit on work/school days?
Is it enough?
Are our lives just too busy to bring up children and give them what they want and also what they need?
Now I imediately thought well thats not me/us. So i went of to find that this is actually a reseach from about a year ago
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/7760585/Family-life-squeezed-into-49-minutes-a-day.html
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8703010.stm
Now by this surverys deffintion 'family time' is pretty much as a whole family. Actually doing something together and focused on eachother. Then all of a sudden 49 minutes (during the week) became very real.
A break down of our evening.
5pm oh arrives home play with lo. I however cook so we're not 'together'
5:30pm we do sit down as a family and eat. 20 mintues 'family time'6pm. Lo goes in the bath OH watches/plays with her. I tidy up
6:30pm into Pjs and start of bedtime. I come up for 10 minutes help with teeth brshing and bring milk 10 minutes family time.
Thats it really, 30 minutes Mon-fri, I was pretty shocked.
Now on the weekends we are always at a park/museum/NTsite/swimming/ farm. So I would say here are at least 3-4 hours per day where it is just us being together doing something then plus our normal night time routine.
I would say obviously becase i am now a sahm I spend a lot more time with her than 49 minutes. Even between naps and cleaning etc. However only 6% felt they needed more time with mum.
I would say we go out a lot more than the average family. It does cost some money but because we have passes for most of these places its not like paying out every weekend just once a year and obviously parks/walks are free.
The survey also pointed out that children were wanting to spend time in the house doing things a a family. Now most of the time Lo is at home on a weekend she is asleep as she still has a 3 hour mid-day nap. But when we are not out and she is not asleep. Me and Oh tend to take it in turns to look after her, as one of us is normally cooking/cleaning/sorting something. Now im not sayng we dont spend time together but in the house but its minutes rather than hours of concentrated play. Not just happening to being within 5 metres of eachother
I dont think this makes anyone a better or worse parent I was simply suprised by how little time mon-fri we actually spent completly together focusing on Lo/eachother
I still think we spend 'enough' time as a family we deffinately have a good bond and get along and work together well. In an ideal world we would be rich and OH wouldnt have to work and we could be together everyday, but that is near enough no ones reality.
So my question; Can anyone really find more than 1 hour in a day to concentrate on being a family unit on work/school days?
Is it enough?
Are our lives just too busy to bring up children and give them what they want and also what they need?