Ruth 1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Messages
- 1,326
- Reaction score
- 0
Bigger babies are meant to sleep better apparently!
Ooh sooooo not true for me! I had a 9lb2 non-sleeping total screamer x
Bigger babies are meant to sleep better apparently!
My daughter was just over 6 pounds and she slept through the night at three weeks. Of course she took one nap in her entire life after that (she wouldn't even sleep in the car!) but she slept through the night like clockwork so I was OK with the that. Her brother was over 10 pounds and that boy slept all night and napped for three hours every afternoon until he was 4. He is 19 now and still falls asleep in the car.
I doubt I would have a big baby but I'm scared of having a baby bigger than last time as for me that was bad enough ... She was 4lb 12 !!!!
Bigger babies are meant to sleep better apparently!
Ooh sooooo not true for me! I had a 9lb2 non-sleeping total screamer x
I doubt I would have a big baby but I'm scared of having a baby bigger than last time as for me that was bad enough ... She was 4lb 12 !!!!
I think this shows that weight has a limited effect on labour, your labour would hav been no less painful than a 9lb baby I am sure
Besides, am I the only one that thinks the contraction stage was much worse than the actual pushing? Size doesn't matter at all then!
I doubt I would have a big baby but I'm scared of having a baby bigger than last time as for me that was bad enough ... She was 4lb 12 !!!!
I think this shows that weight has a limited effect on labour, your labour would hav been no less painful than a 9lb baby I am sure
Besides, am I the only one that thinks the contraction stage was much worse than the actual pushing? Size doesn't matter at all then!
i was contracting 2-10cm in one hour! yet i was pushing for over 2 hours. the 2-10cm was way worse than the pushing stage
I doubt I would have a big baby but I'm scared of having a baby bigger than last time as for me that was bad enough ... She was 4lb 12 !!!!
I think this shows that weight has a limited effect on labour, your labour would hav been no less painful than a 9lb baby I am sure
Besides, am I the only one that thinks the contraction stage was much worse than the actual pushing? Size doesn't matter at all then!
it felt such a relieve for me cos i had something to do during the contraction rather than trying to scramble up the wallsI doubt I would have a big baby but I'm scared of having a baby bigger than last time as for me that was bad enough ... She was 4lb 12 !!!!
I think this shows that weight has a limited effect on labour, your labour would hav been no less painful than a 9lb baby I am sure
Besides, am I the only one that thinks the contraction stage was much worse than the actual pushing? Size doesn't matter at all then!
i was contracting 2-10cm in one hour! yet i was pushing for over 2 hours. the 2-10cm was way worse than the pushing stage
There was something about contracting that made me feel so helpless, yet when I started pushing I was in control and I knew it was ending soon, a different way to deal with the pain.
Yes! My partner was 8 or 9lbs. I was just over 6lbs. He says he wants her to be at least 7lbs. Not a chance. I'm hoping she comes a bit early so she's on the smaller side of healthy. Does that make me sound selfish?
Yes! My partner was 8 or 9lbs. I was just over 6lbs. He says he wants her to be at least 7lbs. Not a chance. I'm hoping she comes a bit early so she's on the smaller side of healthy. Does that make me sound selfish?
Kinda lol....7lb is healthy and normal, even 8lb is normal. If you read above you'll see that a baby's weight doesn't impact much on the type of labour you have so I wouldn't worry about it, your baby will be whatever weight she needs to be when she is ready to be born.