Books V's Films

[CarlyP]

I always think that books are better then the films, they only have roughly 1hr and 30mins, and don't ever seem to get it all in!

I tend to sit there and say 'This happened next', and 'That never happened'

 

[morri]

Honestly I don't know any film. There are films that are quite different to the books and are good films in their own right but for me the visual I get in reading is soo much better than any film. Alone because the films often have to cut out parts to make it to a suitable lengths.

 

[Regalpeas]

I think which ever you see first you'll usually find better.

Case in point, I watched Harry Potter films year 1 - 6 before I read the books. I tried to read the books but I didn't like them as much as the films. However, I must say the Half Blood Prince movie left out waaaayyyy too much info.


Now with Twilight I read the books first and I complained about the films. However as a tried and true Team Jacober I loved the Eclipse movie for a particular reason

Other than that I haven't read too many books to movies. Although, I have many on the reading list this year.

 

[hakunamatata]

I read the Hunger Games and was blown away. I thought the movie almost lived up to it.

Definitely like the Twilight books better. I like the HP books slightly better than the movies but love both.

Ahhhh Jacob eye candy.

 

[Regalpeas]

Oh I forgot about The Hunger Games. Didnt care for the first movie but will probably watch the entire series just bc I like the meaning behind the story. Finished book two earlier this year.

 

[Regalpeas]

I Jacob.

 

[hakunamatata]

Oooh you have to read book 3!

My next husband will be Native American and muscular.

 

[Regalpeas]

Lol! Gorgeous!



Okay, I hope I can borrow it with prime.