snagglepat
Mum of 1, another cooking
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 380
- Reaction score
- 0
It is frustrating, but do stick with it. It was our 18th cycle before we successfully got pregnant the first time (we tried 12 with DP then succeeded on the 6th with me). Then this time it happened the first cycle we tried after I started ovulating again. Some babies are clearly a bit more chilled about when they come to join our families!
You might want to look into the legal implications of trying NI. Over here if we conceive using AI then the same-sex partner can go straight onto the birth certificate as the second parent at birth. If you use NI then you can't do that and have to go through step-parent adoption. (We had to do that with our first as the new law wasn't in place yet and it took over a year of assessments with social services and child protection before it went through - and ours was a supposedly simple case!) It also means that the donor is legally the father of you use NI, regardless of whether he goes on the birth certificate or not and whatever agreements you might have come to beforehand. There's a very big difference! Our donor tried NI with one of the first women he donated to and the relationship got very complicated. He's now a father to that child, not just a donor. As a result he will only ever donate using AI to anyone else - he's learned how blurred the boundaries can get!
I've read that statistically there is no difference in success rates as long as the sperm is used within 20-30 mins of ejaculation. I'd have to look out where I read that to check the source but I know I've heard it more than once. I know lots of people who have used AI and got pregnant on the first attempt, and others who have had to try for months or even years to get there. Just like with the numerous heterosexual partnerships I know who have conceived - some get pregnant in minutes, others go through years of heartache first.
At the end of the day we've all got to choose our own path in this but I know I would never go the NI route. I'm bisexual anyway so it's not a sex issue, but it would seriously blur that donor/recipient boundary, feel all wrong within my monogamous partnership - even if my partner was on board with the idea - and wouldn't even give any specific benefit. Definitely not for me!
Interesting topic though Ruby.
Gina. x
You might want to look into the legal implications of trying NI. Over here if we conceive using AI then the same-sex partner can go straight onto the birth certificate as the second parent at birth. If you use NI then you can't do that and have to go through step-parent adoption. (We had to do that with our first as the new law wasn't in place yet and it took over a year of assessments with social services and child protection before it went through - and ours was a supposedly simple case!) It also means that the donor is legally the father of you use NI, regardless of whether he goes on the birth certificate or not and whatever agreements you might have come to beforehand. There's a very big difference! Our donor tried NI with one of the first women he donated to and the relationship got very complicated. He's now a father to that child, not just a donor. As a result he will only ever donate using AI to anyone else - he's learned how blurred the boundaries can get!
I've read that statistically there is no difference in success rates as long as the sperm is used within 20-30 mins of ejaculation. I'd have to look out where I read that to check the source but I know I've heard it more than once. I know lots of people who have used AI and got pregnant on the first attempt, and others who have had to try for months or even years to get there. Just like with the numerous heterosexual partnerships I know who have conceived - some get pregnant in minutes, others go through years of heartache first.
At the end of the day we've all got to choose our own path in this but I know I would never go the NI route. I'm bisexual anyway so it's not a sex issue, but it would seriously blur that donor/recipient boundary, feel all wrong within my monogamous partnership - even if my partner was on board with the idea - and wouldn't even give any specific benefit. Definitely not for me!
Interesting topic though Ruby.

Gina. x