Dakota Fanning

[feedindy]

It's funny this is banned but Miley Cyrus can dance on a stripper pole on tv. lol

 

[MizzDeeDee]

She plays "Jane" in Twilight.


She is 17 and they said they banned it because she looked younger then 17..... I personally have seen SO much worse.

 

[Abz1982]

i dont think she looks younger than 17. I thought it was Elle Fanning though ,not Dakota? to me she looks like fern cotton!

 

[cherryglitter]

i can kind of see why they have banned it.

to me she does look young, which makes me think of her being virgin, which makes me think of the bottle being her 'flower'

my imagination is a bit nuts though!

 

[smelly07]

was there not something similar with britney spears posing with a teletubbie??? lol.i could be wrong......she does look about 12 in the picture though...even so...if she is 17 then she still isnt officially an 'adult' so i can see why they banned it. x

 

[lepaskilf]

I don't like it. She's only 17, and it is quite sexual

 

[Hayley90]

im not bothered by it, i really like her too.


im sure ive seen it somewhere, maybe its a slightly diff version of it. its def been in vogue

 

[BleedingBlack]

I dont see anything wrong with it.

 

[robinator]

Is the UK in crackdown mode? Didn't they ban an Estee Lauder ad recently, featuring an overly-airbrushed Julia Roberts?

 

[bartlettpear]

yeah, i read they banned an overy airbrushed photo because it didnt "depict real people" or whatever.

I found this photo of crazy lady. at 17!! Wow

https://www.televisioninternet.com/news/pictures/rolling.jpg

 

[Leafy]

it shoudnt have been banned. lame.

 

[Laura2919]

I think there are worse pictures out there...

I like her though.. I spotted her straightaway in the Twilight films I watched last night think.. I feel like I have watched her grow.. She was only a little kid when she started out

 

[RileysMummy]

Now see the Britney pic imo is alot worse. Atleast Dakota has got clothes on!
x

 

[bartlettpear]

Yep, holding a freaking TELATUBBY? how weird... and she looks SO much older than 17 and it wasnt even banned?

 

[purpledahlia]

Ridic, dont see why it was banned!

 

[midori1999]

I thought she was younger than 17 and I do think the picture is very provocative. However, as she is over the UK age of consent, it does seem silly that they have banned it, although I suppose it's all about perception and she does look younger than 17.

That said, mens/porn magazines do deliberately use models who look younger than 18 and they get away with that, which is surely much worse.

 

[morri]

I don't think she looks younger than 17 yo.

 

[Phantom]

A girl's "flower" refers to her virginity so that's the first thing I thought of when I saw the photo. So I can kinda see what the fuss is about.

 

[louise1302]

they ban this but britney spears gyrating in a school uniform at 16 was ok?

madness