Do you HAVE to get a pap test while pregnant?

I would flat out refuse, I would never have a pap smear done during pregnancy, here in Australia - well my doc anyway would never do one while pregnant not worth the risk of poking around in there or introducing any bacteria to your cervix, it can wait, if you have never had an abnormal test result before & haven't had any different sexual partner it is highly unlikely you would desperately need one, we have them every 2 years here - I usually always go 2 1/2 years my doc says that's fine to even go 3 years
 
I have had them done in pregnancy because I have had CINIII in the past and now I have annual smears to ensure no cell changes. The usual schedule here for smears is one year after your first and then 3yrly. On my second smear CINIII was detected and removed within weeks. My OB told me that if it had been 3 yrs between smears, I would probably had incredibly invasive cancer or worse! Cells do change during pregnancy and the hormones released in pregnancy encourage massive cell growth, otherwise little dividing cells would never be little people nine months later. If your cervix has change on it now that are dangerous, 9 months could put you in a very difficult and dangerous position once baby is born. A school friend died 6weeks after her second baby was born as she had no idea that her cancer was present, let alone accelerated. That is a horror story of course and obviously most mums go on to have no problems but pregnancy accelerates growth of all cells, good and bad and the symptoms of pregnancy would mask any symptoms of invasive malignancy. No one thinks cervical cancer will ever effect them. I was a huge shock to me but I am so happy that I can monitor what I know is a risk factor for me.
 
You absolutely can refuse, and if you don't feel comfortable, there's no reason to put yourself through that. It's definitely something that can wait until after pregnancy. The virus that causes cervical cancer (and the vast majority of abnormal cell changes) is incredibly slow progressing in all but a few very rare cases. In most people who even have it (which frankly, is pretty much all sexually active women), even when it causes abnormal cell changes on the cervix, the body is able to fight it off in time and clear all the bad cells, so that everything goes back to normal. I had a bunch of abnormal smears years ago and had to have a colposcopy and biopsy. They were pre-cancerous, but not incredibly serious, and two years later, my body wiped them out and my smears went back to normal.

I would say the thing to think about is what you would do if you got an abnormal result. I think the approach in the UK is to typically wait a year after the abnormal result and do another smear to see if it's still abnormal. Would you want to have that to worry about for a year while you should be enjoying your pregnancy and new baby? Or would it be better to wait and get the smear done later knowing they wouldn't do anything in the meantime but ask you to wait? I was living in the U.S. at the time I got my first abnormal results and there the approach is to to go straight to the colposcopy and biopsy (it's a very profitable procedure, so there's no waiting if they can make money off you). You probably wouldn't want to have a colposcopy done while pregnant (because you couldn't have the biopsy anyway, which could potentially weaken your cervix and cause premature dilation - actually it can cause risks during pregnancy even if like me, you've had it done way before you got pregnant, nor could you be treated for cervical cancer during pregnancy). So I guess the thing is, think about what your next move would be if anything abnormal did come back, and whether you would want that during pregnancy or if you'd rather just wait. In the small chance that there are abnormal cells, more than likely if you just wait without testing, they'd clear themselves out in a year or two.

And even if they were the particularly virulent kind that did progress to cancer, it takes on average 10 years for cancer to actually develop (which is why most guidelines only recommend screening every 3-5 years anyway). So there is plenty of time to attend to getting a smear and worrying about this stuff once you have your baby. Knowing my history with abnormal smears and knowing what I know about medicine, I wouldn't worry about getting one done during pregnancy. It's not necessary, unless you were having lots of unusual and worrying symptoms, like bleeding and pain during sex, before you got pregnant. If you are worried about STIs or BV, they don't test these during a smear anyway (though many people do get them done during the same vaginal exam). These are actually tested using a cotton swab and not the wire pipe cleaner thing used for smears, and are easy to do during pregnancy if it's something that concerns you.
 
I have just read the previous post and I have to say, I disagree with a number of aspects of the posts. Not all cervical cancers are slow to progress. Some are very fast moving. My experience I had less than one year between a clear smear and CINIII which was verging on cancer in situ. I was told I was very lucky to have detected it so early and was scheduled within weeks for biopsy to confirm then surgery. It was all done three weeks post smear and I can tell you, things don't move that quick in NZ on a public health system unless it is super urgent. You can't even get seen for an inguinal hernia at our main hospital as the wait list to be seen is over three years let alone surgery. Some people clear CINI changes and those are the type they monitor and check a year later. Of course the risk of an invasive and quick moving cancer is not huge but the risk of a smear causing miscarriage or infection is smaller. There is a reason why Drs in many countries make cervical screening as routine antenatal screening. At the end of the day the decision is up to an individual but the risk and stats mean little when it affects you personally. I think a discussion with your health professional to go over risks is essential for making an informed decision.

Low grade changes are not always treated but high grade changes are very serious and are often treated.

In regards to the screening schedule timing. My OB told me that she would advise all women to get annual smears but the govt makes a cost/benefit analysis and realise although 3 yearly screening won't save all women from cervical cancer, it will save the vast majority and those losses are mitagated by overall expense. It is understood that 3 yearly screening will cost some lives but like all budget restraints, the govt also has to hedge it bets. Sucks to be the small percent that do die or have their cervix removed though.
 
This is what NHS has to say about it..

https://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/1646.aspx?CategoryID=54&SubCategoryID=130

It is very rare to have changes on the cervix that will turn cancerous quickly, progression to cancer typically takes 15 (3 to 40) years.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,407
Messages
27,149,468
Members
255,821
Latest member
Bumper23
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"