Hi everyone
I took Ethan for his 4 month injections on Monday and while we were there the HV told me he had eczema - she said it looked infected. I had never seen that HV before she is not my usual one. I didn't think the skin looked infected, it was just red - no pus and it wasn't even really bothering him. However, as I don't have much basis for comparison I accepted her opinion.
I explained that I was planning on asking the GP about it when they gave him the injections, as I had been using Oilatum for kids and it hadn't done anything. The HV then said "don't under any circumstances give him any solids whatsoever until he is at least 6 months, and not without coming back to us first". I was a bit surprised so I asked why, and she said he could develop allergies as he had such "bad" eczema. I explained that the eczema had only started when we took him to waterbabies, and the instructor had said the chlorine sometimes irritates the skin. It's only on his face, nowhere else.
Anyways, the HV was adamant I shouldn't give him solids until minimum 6 months, and not before seeing the GP. When I took him into the GP the GP said it looks a bit dry (no mention of infection) and prescribed some Epaderm, which has worked brilliantly and his skin is nearly 100% clear now after only 4 days of using it.
Ethan has recently started following our food with his eyes, and has been consistently draining 7oz bottles of hungry baby milk and sometime cries when he finishes the bottle, I'm sure he would take more if offered. He looks like he is ready for a teeny bit of baby rice but I'm a bit worried about how adament the HV was about him being 6 months. He will be 4 months at the end of Sept so I will wait till then anyway but I really can't see him waiting till he is 6 months old. Should I take him back to the GP now, even though his skin is now fine? Part of me thinks the HV was over-reacting (GP didn't say anything about not starting solids, or it looking infected) but I am aware I am not medically trained either!
Any advice?
I took Ethan for his 4 month injections on Monday and while we were there the HV told me he had eczema - she said it looked infected. I had never seen that HV before she is not my usual one. I didn't think the skin looked infected, it was just red - no pus and it wasn't even really bothering him. However, as I don't have much basis for comparison I accepted her opinion.
I explained that I was planning on asking the GP about it when they gave him the injections, as I had been using Oilatum for kids and it hadn't done anything. The HV then said "don't under any circumstances give him any solids whatsoever until he is at least 6 months, and not without coming back to us first". I was a bit surprised so I asked why, and she said he could develop allergies as he had such "bad" eczema. I explained that the eczema had only started when we took him to waterbabies, and the instructor had said the chlorine sometimes irritates the skin. It's only on his face, nowhere else.
Anyways, the HV was adamant I shouldn't give him solids until minimum 6 months, and not before seeing the GP. When I took him into the GP the GP said it looks a bit dry (no mention of infection) and prescribed some Epaderm, which has worked brilliantly and his skin is nearly 100% clear now after only 4 days of using it.
Ethan has recently started following our food with his eyes, and has been consistently draining 7oz bottles of hungry baby milk and sometime cries when he finishes the bottle, I'm sure he would take more if offered. He looks like he is ready for a teeny bit of baby rice but I'm a bit worried about how adament the HV was about him being 6 months. He will be 4 months at the end of Sept so I will wait till then anyway but I really can't see him waiting till he is 6 months old. Should I take him back to the GP now, even though his skin is now fine? Part of me thinks the HV was over-reacting (GP didn't say anything about not starting solids, or it looking infected) but I am aware I am not medically trained either!
Any advice?