Personally I wouldn't put anything 'solid' into a bottle. I don't even give water in bottles anymore, just his milk. There's a risk of choking, not to mention a risk that they wont want to drink formula without the rusk in it as it's so sweet.
I assume that your LO is eating you out of house and home at the moment due to his 3 month growth spurt - I would just up the feeds rather than giving solids. 2 reasons, before 17 weeks it's really not recommended (I'm not going to star the whole early weaning arguments) and also, rusks contain gluten which isn't recommended before 6 months (not to mention a shed load of sugar!!).
Personally I wouldn't put anything 'solid' into a bottle. I don't even give water in bottles anymore, just his milk. There's a risk of choking, not to mention a risk that they wont want to drink formula without the rusk in it as it's so sweet.
I assume that your LO is eating you out of house and home at the moment due to his 3 month growth spurt - I would just up the feeds rather than giving solids. 2 reasons, before 17 weeks it's really not recommended (I'm not going to star the whole early weaning arguments) and also, rusks contain gluten which isn't recommended before 6 months (not to mention a shed load of sugar!!).
Agree 100%IF you feel LO really does need some solids (and I'd always check with your GP first) there are far healthier things you can give than Rusks, eg baby rice or fruit and veg purees.
Oh what an awful Mother I must be![]()
Thanks so much for the advice everyone. I had a feeling that it was too early to be giving my son any kind of food, but was considering it because of advice I was given by somebody else, who said giving part of a rusk in milk may make my son more content and less likely to wake up so many times at night. He gets up around 3 times during the night. She gave her son rusks very early on in his milk.