You have given to many what if's. The facts are that they are completely different. I don't know how anyone could answer your question because it's a question based on stuff that isn't true. Female circ isn't cleaner, it doesn't help prevent std's, it is t a religious thing. I find this thread a little weird. You're basically equating a person's decision to circumsized their son with female genital mutilation and that isn't fair. You are from a different culture than I am and we have different views. But you can't lump me into the category of a person who would mutilate their daughter so that she can't enjoy sex. The two things are very very different. Circs are done with anesthesia and there is research that says it has benefits (you can find the opposite I'm sure, but you could also find research on anything if you look hard enough). As women, I don't think we can truly understand this issue. We don't have a penis. My husband is uncircumsized and I gave him the decision about our upcoming son. He chose to circumsized him, and I will back his decision fully.
You have given to many what if's. The facts are that they are completely different. I don't know how anyone could answer your question because it's a question based on stuff that isn't true. Female circ isn't cleaner, it doesn't help prevent std's, it is t a religious thing. I find this thread a little weird. You're basically equating a person's decision to circumsized their son with female genital mutilation and that isn't fair. You are from a different culture than I am and we have different views. But you can't lump me into the category of a person who would mutilate their daughter so that she can't enjoy sex. The two things are very very different. Circs are done with anesthesia and there is research that says it has benefits (you can find the opposite I'm sure, but you could also find research on anything if you look hard enough). As women, I don't think we can truly understand this issue. We don't have a penis. My husband is uncircumsized and I gave him the decision about our upcoming son. He chose to circumsized him, and I will back his decision fully.
j/w but why doesnt you husband get circumcised if he thinks its the best? find it a bit odd to subject that on your son when you wouldnt get it done.
You have given to many what if's. The facts are that they are completely different. I don't know how anyone could answer your question because it's a question based on stuff that isn't true. Female circ isn't cleaner, it doesn't help prevent std's, it is t a religious thing. I find this thread a little weird. You're basically equating a person's decision to circumsized their son with female genital mutilation and that isn't fair. You are from a different culture than I am and we have different views. But you can't lump me into the category of a person who would mutilate their daughter so that she can't enjoy sex. The two things are very very different. Circs are done with anesthesia and there is research that says it has benefits (you can find the opposite I'm sure, but you could also find research on anything if you look hard enough). As women, I don't think we can truly understand this issue. We don't have a penis. My husband is uncircumsized and I gave him the decision about our upcoming son. He chose to circumsized him, and I will back his decision fully.
j/w but why doesnt you husband get circumcised if he thinks its the best? find it a bit odd to subject that on your son when you wouldnt get it done.
Because if it is going to be done, it should be done in the first few days of life before awareness of self is truely developed. It's proven that it is much better to have it done at this time. But also because his mother and father chose to have him not circumsized I guess. I dont think my husband hates not being circumsized or anything, I think he just thinks the other way is better. You can believe any way you want and I can too. I won't force my decision on you. But please don't make rodiculus comparisons like this thread is doing.
I dont know if it was the above user who commented in the other thread on a similar vain however I think we can draw common themes.
In the USA it is common to be cir'd and obviously you compare yourself to your peers, in the other thread a user talked about looking alone a urinal line and feeling different to his peers. That she didnt want her son to not be 'the norm'. In other countries it is the cultural norm for girls to have their genitalia altered and I think LW mentioned that if they dont have it done they feel un clean and unwanted by men. Then we have the women in other cultures mutilating thier bodies by putting plates in/streaching the neck.
It all comes down to being the same as your gender peers to make yourself the most attractive option to a mate. Which is very funder mental in all of humanity, even in the animal kingdom, where penguins build little piles of rocks, yes it isnt self mutilation but it is changing the environment around them to appear more attractive.
What about women in the western world, having their breast cut open to insert PIP implants. That kind of body adjustment has proven potentially more harmful that putting a disk in you mouth. I think the tribes women in these cultures would think western woman were just as odd for having implants put into their breasts.
Im not saying its all the same, as clearly there are differences in performing surgery on children who cannot consent and adults. However I think there are cultural comparisons to be made
Also ,is it true about an old practice for Jewish Rabbis to use a thumb nail and alcohol to circumcise on babies at birth? Can't remember who told me this, could have been my midwife friend or Jewish friend?!
they are both forms of mutilation
mu·ti·late (my t l- t ). tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates. 1. To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple. 2. To disfigure by damaging irreparably: