for all the young mums/mums to be

L

Laura--x

Guest
and for you who are still with your boyfriend/girlfriend

Whos name do/did you give to the baby ? yours or the fathers ?

this is one huge issue me and my oh are having, and him as his family want their name, but me and my family want my name, and we are just constantly bickering over it.
 
oh dear oh dear oh dear!

how about if u can't decide you use double barrel.
and use both names :)

hope that helps a little bit.

what a touh decision let us know how u get on :D x
 
I think at this stage we'll be using my surname, both our names together doesn't really go and I'd kinda prefer to use my surname which isn't a problem for my bf's family cos they don't even want me to keep the baby :roll:

you could try using both names together if they go? x
 
and for you who are still with your boyfriend/girlfriend

Whos name do/did you give to the baby ? yours or the fathers ?

this is one huge issue me and my oh are having, and him as his family want their name, but me and my family want my name, and we are just constantly bickering over it.

Oooh lol I know that feelingg.
Do your names go well together so you could have a double barrel?
xxx
 
they dont really go well together no :|

urghh decisions !
 
We're giving it my name. I pretend to OH's mum i don't mind which name bump takes because anytime i see her its always 'Have you decided whos name it's taking yet? don't forget if it takes your name if you's ever get married he'll have to adopt his own baby!' or or or 'If you want it to have his name you have to go to court and ask permission!' BUT 'if his names on the birth certificate it has to have his name anyway' i just humour her as she dosen't seem to know what shes talking about. and OH and i decided its easier to have my name as if we did ever get married it's a simple name change for bump, whereas if we were to break up sooner rather than later there'd be questions about mine and bumps name being different, even though Skip would be in bumps life still.
But i say give bump your name, it shouldn't bother your boyfriend, if it bothers his parents it just seems like they want that hold over the baby if something goes wrong with you and your OH.
 
We're giving it my name. I pretend to OH's mum i don't mind which name bump takes because anytime i see her its always 'Have you decided whos name it's taking yet? don't forget if it takes your name if you's ever get married he'll have to adopt his own baby!' or or or 'If you want it to have his name you have to go to court and ask permission!' BUT 'if his names on the birth certificate it has to have his name anyway' i just humour her as she dosen't seem to know what shes talking about. and OH and i decided its easier to have my name as if we did ever get married it's a simple name change for bump, whereas if we were to break up sooner rather than later there'd be questions about mine and bumps name being different, even though Skip would be in bumps life still.
But i say give bump your name, it shouldn't bother your boyfriend, if it bothers his parents it just seems like they want that hold over the baby if something goes wrong with you and your OH.

omg
that is exactly the same as my mil, she says those exact same words ! ' i hope you know if baby has your name and you both get married he will have to adopt his own baby' ! oh shutup woman, you cant bloody adopt your own baby ! its just a name change !

yeah thats exactly what my family are saying, if he ever walks away the family just want hold of him/her . I should just tell them straight but im too soft :rofl:
 
i'm giving katie my OHs name, dont know why, just seems right. plus his name's tonnes nicer than mine! we're plannin on gettin married at some point anyway and it saves changin the name. a friend of mine has gone for a double barrell name, she split with her oh before the babies were born
 
I plan on giving my bump my OH's last name. I don't see us splitting anytime in the near future so it's just easier to go with my OHs. Plus, I really prefer my OH last name compared to mine :)
 
Our baby is taking the OH's name.

I personally wouldn't have the baby take my name as we fully intend to get married eventually and so my name will be changing anyway. Not just that, I don't see what gives me the right to decide over the OH, our daughter is 50% Mummy and 50% Daddy.

He deserves at the very least some recognition for being the father. Baby is just as much his as mine, doesn't matter who carries her for the 9months, it took us both to make her.

I'm also very proud he's the father and so I take great pleasure in our baby taking his name.

Babies aren't things, they're little people. If you think there's a chance family's will fight over the baby and stuff like that, then I think everyone is looking at it from the wrong angle. Children are not possessions to throw at each other in an argument "well you do that, you wont see your kid" or "well I want maintenance" ... Its views like that that cause the problems. I don't see what would give a Mother more "rights" to the baby than the Father. <--- Personal Opinion so don't get offended.
 
Caitlyn has Richs last name and I regret it. When we fight it makes me realise if we broke up she would have a different last name from me FOREVER.
 
Our baby is taking the OH's name.

I personally wouldn't have the baby take my name as we fully intend to get married eventually and so my name will be changing anyway. Not just that, I don't see what gives me the right to decide over the OH, our daughter is 50% Mummy and 50% Daddy.

He deserves at the very least some recognition for being the father. Baby is just as much his as mine, doesn't matter who carries her for the 9months, it took us both to make her.

I'm also very proud he's the father and so I take great pleasure in our baby taking his name.

Babies aren't things, they're little people. If you think there's a chance family's will fight over the baby and stuff like that, then I think everyone is looking at it from the wrong angle. Children are not possessions to throw at each other in an argument "well you do that, you wont see your kid" or "well I want maintenance" ... Its views like that that cause the problems. I don't see what would give a Mother more "rights" to the baby than the Father. <--- Personal Opinion so don't get offended.

Yeah they are 50% mommy and 50% daddy, but at the end of the day, your the one whos stuck with that baby for life. Your partner could (not saying he would ) run anytime he wants, when you least expect it. Yeah ok he will have to pay towards the child, but thats it.

I have both views on this subject which is why its so hard for me to choose. I do agree that the father should have some recognition and having the fathers last name is good, but then again, if something did happen and you split up, that baby is stuck with their daddys name forever.

At the end of the day , if 2 people are that sure they are going to be together and get married, why not give the baby your name, and just change both of your names when you get married ? if your names changing anyway, why not the babies too ?
 
Our baby is taking the OH's name.

I personally wouldn't have the baby take my name as we fully intend to get married eventually and so my name will be changing anyway. Not just that, I don't see what gives me the right to decide over the OH, our daughter is 50% Mummy and 50% Daddy.

He deserves at the very least some recognition for being the father. Baby is just as much his as mine, doesn't matter who carries her for the 9months, it took us both to make her.

I'm also very proud he's the father and so I take great pleasure in our baby taking his name.

Babies aren't things, they're little people. If you think there's a chance family's will fight over the baby and stuff like that, then I think everyone is looking at it from the wrong angle. Children are not possessions to throw at each other in an argument "well you do that, you wont see your kid" or "well I want maintenance" ... Its views like that that cause the problems. I don't see what would give a Mother more "rights" to the baby than the Father. <--- Personal Opinion so don't get offended.

Yeah they are 50% mommy and 50% daddy, but at the end of the day, your the one whos stuck with that baby for life. Your partner could (not saying he would ) run anytime he wants, when you least expect it. Yeah ok he will have to pay towards the child, but thats it.

I have both views on this subject which is why its so hard for me to choose. I do agree that the father should have some recognition and having the fathers last name is good, but then again, if something did happen and you split up, that baby is stuck with their daddys name forever.

At the end of the day , if 2 people are that sure they are going to be together and get married, why not give the baby your name, and just change both of your names when you get married ? if your names changing anyway, why not the babies too ?

Because that's making twice the work, common sense says why do something twice when you only have to do it once.


Also, Mothers can just as easily dump the baby and run, mine did it and my Dad brought me up.

Why try and take everything away from the Father? He doesn't get to carry the baby or know how it feels to go through the 9months of pregnancy, so why strip him of the one thing that shows the baby is just as much a part of him as it is you?

Its back down to the possessions thing again, you see? Babies are not possessions.

Why do you say the baby is "stuck" with Daddy's name like its a bad thing, Daddy is and will always be their Daddy, you can't take that away from them regardless of what happens.

Why's everyone so against Dad's as if Dad's are the only ones to up and run and be sh*t parents, I don't have enough fingers to count the amount of bad mothers that I've been made aware of in my life.
 
Our baby is taking the OH's name.

I personally wouldn't have the baby take my name as we fully intend to get married eventually and so my name will be changing anyway. Not just that, I don't see what gives me the right to decide over the OH, our daughter is 50% Mummy and 50% Daddy.

He deserves at the very least some recognition for being the father. Baby is just as much his as mine, doesn't matter who carries her for the 9months, it took us both to make her.

I'm also very proud he's the father and so I take great pleasure in our baby taking his name.

Babies aren't things, they're little people. If you think there's a chance family's will fight over the baby and stuff like that, then I think everyone is looking at it from the wrong angle. Children are not possessions to throw at each other in an argument "well you do that, you wont see your kid" or "well I want maintenance" ... Its views like that that cause the problems. I don't see what would give a Mother more "rights" to the baby than the Father. <--- Personal Opinion so don't get offended.

Yeah they are 50% mommy and 50% daddy, but at the end of the day, your the one whos stuck with that baby for life. Your partner could (not saying he would ) run anytime he wants, when you least expect it. Yeah ok he will have to pay towards the child, but thats it.

I have both views on this subject which is why its so hard for me to choose. I do agree that the father should have some recognition and having the fathers last name is good, but then again, if something did happen and you split up, that baby is stuck with their daddys name forever.

At the end of the day , if 2 people are that sure they are going to be together and get married, why not give the baby your name, and just change both of your names when you get married ? if your names changing anyway, why not the babies too ?

Because that's making twice the work, common sense says why do something twice when you only have to do it once.


Also, Mothers can just as easily dump the baby and run, mine did it and my Dad brought me up.

Why try and take everything away from the Father? He doesn't get to carry the baby or know how it feels to go through the 9months of pregnancy, so why strip him of the one thing that shows the baby is just as much a part of him as it is you?

Its back down to the possessions thing again, you see? Babies are not possessions.

Why do you say the baby is "stuck" with Daddy's name like its a bad thing, Daddy is and will always be their Daddy, you can't take that away from them regardless of what happens.

Why's everyone so against Dad's as if Dad's are the only ones to up and run and be sh*t parents, I don't have enough fingers to count the amount of bad mothers that I've been made aware of in my life.

im not at all saying babies are possessions. Im just saying.

I find that teenage dads have too much pressure put on them. You get all this help for teenage mums and pregnant girls, but hardly anything for teenage dads. Ive witnessed with my own eyes a boy who has run away from his baby and his babys mother just because he thought no-one would be there to help him. And that is a big problem as too why teenage boys do run away, they are afraid of responsibility and scared they arn't getting the support the mothers do.

Teenage boys dont mature as fast as girls, which is another reason why they are more likely to run. Also the peer pressue off their friends of being a 'dad' at such a young age. Boys get popularity points for getting it on with any girl he can, and become the centre of attention, but as soon as responsiblity hits them, they run.

The amount of support there is nowadays for teenage mothers, you dont hear half as many storied of them abondoning their babies, because of the help they get. Whereas boys its a completely different story. And although they might swear to the mother they'll do all they can to do well by her and the baby, as soon as he realises he cant be going out with his friends everyday, and is having to get up 3/4 times a night and changing dirty nappies, they soon realise its not what they wanted.
 
Our baby is taking the OH's name.

I personally wouldn't have the baby take my name as we fully intend to get married eventually and so my name will be changing anyway. Not just that, I don't see what gives me the right to decide over the OH, our daughter is 50% Mummy and 50% Daddy.

He deserves at the very least some recognition for being the father. Baby is just as much his as mine, doesn't matter who carries her for the 9months, it took us both to make her.

I'm also very proud he's the father and so I take great pleasure in our baby taking his name.

Babies aren't things, they're little people. If you think there's a chance family's will fight over the baby and stuff like that, then I think everyone is looking at it from the wrong angle. Children are not possessions to throw at each other in an argument "well you do that, you wont see your kid" or "well I want maintenance" ... Its views like that that cause the problems. I don't see what would give a Mother more "rights" to the baby than the Father. <--- Personal Opinion so don't get offended.

Yeah they are 50% mommy and 50% daddy, but at the end of the day, your the one whos stuck with that baby for life. Your partner could (not saying he would ) run anytime he wants, when you least expect it. Yeah ok he will have to pay towards the child, but thats it.

I have both views on this subject which is why its so hard for me to choose. I do agree that the father should have some recognition and having the fathers last name is good, but then again, if something did happen and you split up, that baby is stuck with their daddys name forever.

At the end of the day , if 2 people are that sure they are going to be together and get married, why not give the baby your name, and just change both of your names when you get married ? if your names changing anyway, why not the babies too ?

Because that's making twice the work, common sense says why do something twice when you only have to do it once.


Also, Mothers can just as easily dump the baby and run, mine did it and my Dad brought me up.

Why try and take everything away from the Father? He doesn't get to carry the baby or know how it feels to go through the 9months of pregnancy, so why strip him of the one thing that shows the baby is just as much a part of him as it is you?

Its back down to the possessions thing again, you see? Babies are not possessions.

Why do you say the baby is "stuck" with Daddy's name like its a bad thing, Daddy is and will always be their Daddy, you can't take that away from them regardless of what happens.

Why's everyone so against Dad's as if Dad's are the only ones to up and run and be sh*t parents, I don't have enough fingers to count the amount of bad mothers that I've been made aware of in my life.

im not at all saying babies are possessions. Im just saying.

I find that teenage dads have too much pressure put on them. You get all this help for teenage mums and pregnant girls, but hardly anything for teenage dads. Ive witnessed with my own eyes a boy who has run away from his baby and his babys mother just because he thought no-one would be there to help him. And that is a big problem as too why teenage boys do run away, they are afraid of responsibility and scared they arn't getting the support the mothers do.

Teenage boys dont mature as fast as girls, which is another reason why they are more likely to run. Also the peer pressue off their friends of being a 'dad' at such a young age. Boys get popularity points for getting it on with any girl he can, and become the centre of attention, but as soon as responsiblity hits them, they run.

The amount of support there is nowadays for teenage mothers, you dont hear half as many storied of them abondoning their babies, because of the help they get. Whereas boys its a completely different story. And although they might swear to the mother they'll do all they can to do well by her and the baby, as soon as he realises he cant be going out with his friends everyday, and is having to get up 3/4 times a night and changing dirty nappies, they soon realise its not what they wanted.

I know what you're saying yeah, its not just teenage dad's though, its all dad's. Up until the last few years, Dad's got next to no help at all.

Even when it came to me needing the toilet when I was little, my Dad was faced with, does he takes me to the ladies or the mens? He tried taking me to the ladies and was called a pervert for doing so.

I was even kicked out of my dancing lessons because my Dad didn't know how to tie my hair up into a hair net and out of all the other mothers only one stood up and offered to teach my Dad how to do it.

I just find that Mam's can be evil and poisonous just as Dad's can be irresponsible. It works both ways really.

I hope you can come to some arrangement between you and your OH, at the end of the day, this isn't about what either of you want, and its even less to do with the family on either side. Its what's right for the baby and if all you're doing is bickering over which surname the baby takes, you're gonna find a whole lot more to bicker about in the future. So I genuinely do hope that you can both get your heads together and see that and somehow go from there.

Its not easy when families interfere and honestly, I think it'd be a whole lot easier if you both spoke to your families and told them to back off a bit and give you both some space to breathe and try and sort things out together as Mam and Dad sorta thing. :)
 
Yeahh it is, but in the topic of this thread, im specifically aiming the question at teenage couples.

I hope so too. Its just hard because he is so into his family, like everything they say is right and they're never wrong, so when my family say something, its completely not fair ! his family said this so his family are right, my family dont have a clue what their talking about !

Its just something we're gonna have to think and talk about :)
 
I'm 19... Thus a teenager... That was my opinion.
 
Also, when it comes to teenagers, alot of teenage boys run because they feel their going to or are missing out on all those nights of partying, drinking it up and doing god knows what, whereas the female gets the 9 months of not doing that stuff and is alot more prepared than a guy. i know my OH and i fully intend to stay together, not for bump but because after a week of not being together we realised its eachother we want and when bump comes we will just get closer! Names can change, so for now bump will have my name, and if we get married or even if we dont and are still together years down the line bumps name can still be changed.
 
Also, when it comes to teenagers, alot of teenage boys run because they feel their going to or are missing out on all those nights of partying, drinking it up and doing god knows what, whereas the female gets the 9 months of not doing that stuff and is alot more prepared than a guy. i know my OH and i fully intend to stay together, not for bump but because after a week of not being together we realised its eachother we want and when bump comes we will just get closer! Names can change, so for now bump will have my name, and if we get married or even if we dont and are still together years down the line bumps name can still be changed.

very good pointt :)
 
Also the fact that Laura is 16 makes even something as small as whos name bump takes a big deal, because look at some of the older girls on this forum, some have split from their OH's during their pregnancy, and whos to say that won't happen with Laura and her OH? or even in a year or so? (hoping it all works out for you's though) im only 18, but i still see 16 as alot younger and i know if i was 16 i would want bump to have my name no matter how much i loved or how long i thought i'd be with my OH until i was older and could see that yeah, maybe we will be together for a good few years or that we would end up married someday.

hope that dosent come across as patronising to you Laura! if so, i apoligise *hugs*
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,650,308
Messages
27,144,987
Members
255,759
Latest member
boom2211
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "c48fb0faa520c8dfff8c4deab485d3d2"
<-- Admiral -->