marley2580
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2007
- Messages
- 6,264
- Reaction score
- 0
Is it not fair to say that the mother's experience/condition/emotional wellbeing during pregnancy and childbirth is inextricably bound to her baby's condition, so even where it appears she is doing it for "herself", isn't she really doing it for baby?
It depends in what context, in a straight forward 'low risk' pregnancy then yes I could see your point of view, in a 'high risk' pregnancy when medical professionals believe it to be risky to have a home birth but the mother insists anyway so she gets 'the experience she wants' then no I disagree she is not doing it for her baby then but for herself.
I wen't 'against medical advice' with my second, not because I selfishly wanted a particular experience, but because I truly believed that it was best for both me and the baby. I believed that if I went into hospital I would be pressured into continuous monitoring leading to me having to labour on my back (not a position I labour well in) or getting stressed by being pressured. As a result of this I would have become quite stressed which would not be good for the baby and she would very possibly gone into distress. I also would not have had the same one to one care that I got from my wonderful community midwives who supported my choice.
It's never as simple as the doctor says a homebirth is risky so you shouldn't do it. Medical opinion is divided on a lot of it - there are midwifes that fully support something like a VBAC at home, while there are others that are dead against it, the same is true about doctors. NICE guidelines now say that a woman that has had one previous section should be treated in the same way as a woman that has never given birth, yet many doctors and midwifes do treat them differently. So who do you go with? The doctor or the guidelines? This is why you need to inform yourself of all the risks and make the best decision for you and your baby.