Hopeful2014
E's mom, TTC
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,757
- Reaction score
- 0
I've been researching a lot. So far what I've found is a lot of women saying that the times they had more stable temps in luteal phase it led to BFP. Of course it's not always the case; some women said they were fairly stable and it ended with a negative.
There are also women who said they regularly had stable temps so they could never tell if it had any impact on their results. You might never notice/consider it if it is normal for you. But what if it is not normal for you?
I know the temps relate to hormones. Steady hormones = steady temps. Ultimately, I know it's different for everyone. From any research you've done or past BFP cycles of your own, do you think cycles with more stable temps in the luteal phase tend to result in BFPs more or does it matter?
Thanks!
There are also women who said they regularly had stable temps so they could never tell if it had any impact on their results. You might never notice/consider it if it is normal for you. But what if it is not normal for you?
I know the temps relate to hormones. Steady hormones = steady temps. Ultimately, I know it's different for everyone. From any research you've done or past BFP cycles of your own, do you think cycles with more stable temps in the luteal phase tend to result in BFPs more or does it matter?
Thanks!