I'm probably going to be viewed as a bitch for saying this, but why have a child if you know you can't afford to support them without benefits?
I waited until I was in a financially stable position to have a baby, that meant I had to wait til I was 29. I hated waiting, but imo it was the right thing to do. I couldn't have afforded a baby before then.
Flame me down now!
In an ideal world maybe you would be right but for some people, their circumstances change beyond their control. I never expected I would end up as a single mom on benefits. When I started my family I was married and had a good job but now my husband has left me and I can't afford to work because the cost of childcare for 3 pre-schoolers in comparison to what I would earn makes it impossible to work.
Well that's completely different. I was referring to people who think about what benefits they're going to be entitled to before they're even pregnant etc. Sadly I do know people like that
But I didn't post that to cause an argument anyway, it's just my opinion. I don't know the OP's situation, that could be how it's happened for her and if it is i'm sorry for her.
Sorry to go off topic from the original question, but seeing all the replies on here has really got me thinking about how people survive on relatively low incomes.
Our monthly outgoings before any necessities likes petrol or food shopping are:
Mortgage - £1100 (for a 3 bed semi)
Council tax - £184
Gas - £48
Electricity - £41
Landline and internet - £14
Water - £34
Mobile - £50
Car insurances - £70
Home insurance - £30
Sky - £51
I have to spend £60 a week on petrol just for getting to work and back, so that's another £240 per month. So before any food or weekly shop is done, our outgoings are close to £1900. I believe you'd have to be earning around £30k per year to bring home £1900 a month after tax - which is a lot more than some of the combined incomes in this thread.
Obviously the Sky is a luxury but every else is pretty much needed (could get rid of mobiles I suppose). I am genuinely intrigued as to how people on less than £25k household income survive - I must be doing something wrong as we really struggle every month! Or are my bills just really high?
On the original question, I kind of have mixed feelings about the cuts. I totally agree that you shouldn't have children on the basis of only being able to afford them if you get benefits, and also the theory that if you earn over a certain amount then you shouldn't need benefits. However, I also think that those of us who do work and always have done, then tax credits are deserved, irrespective of how much you earn. If we weren't working then we would be costing the government a lot more in benefits, therefore getting a token amount in tax credits shouldn't be too much to ask. I don't know, as I said, mixed opinions...
Wow! I kid you not I'm sitting in astonishment considering we on paper before tax earn 52k as a household yet we cannot afford sky we have a freeview box and that's it. Perhaps that gives an example of how on paper a middle earner well over the 43 and 27 brackets set out by CTC actually has less disposable income than someone on a lower salary...granted in 4 years when both my children will be in school we won't have so much childcare to pay for (will only need afterschool carer) but until then we are living with next to nothing
Worked out OH earns 10,400 a year, before tax reductions. We get CTC, WTC and CB. I think CTC and WTC are about 200 a week, plus 36 a week CB.
lol...seeing claire's post has also reminded me neither me or OH has life insurance as can't afford it and i cancelled my union membership as again can't afford that...the mind boggles as to how as a household we are considered rolling in it yet we're not!
Child benefit isn't means tested; so everyone used to get it until recently regardless of income or if they worked or not, even the royal family used to get it. Everyone who is on an income under 44k I think it is, for their household, gets child benefit and those that get it the rate is fixed and I think it is nearly £20 a week for the first child and about £13 for any subsequent children. If they are paying you onlu £10 a week for it; they are underpaying you
https://www.hmrc.gov.uk/childbenefit/payments-entitlements/payments/rates.htm
xx
the BIG differentiator between what people earn and how much disposable income they end up with is the location they live in. compare some of the mortgage/rent costs people have quoted in this thread....i've seen everything from £1100 to £358. Yes they may have different size houses etc but its more than just that.
If you earn a higher income as a result of living in the wealthier area then not only are you taxed more (quite rightly) but you're not entitled to any benefits and your mortgage costs/council tax/travel costs are likely to be SIGNIFICANTLY higher as a result
Also, for those comparing how much they earn when you're paid less than the 27K limit then remember that 27K doesnt result to 2K in your bank account each month
someone earning 13K per year will only be taxed on 3K of what they earn so the difference is huge to those earning 27K.
Also, what if you have the higher earning job because of a degree you've studied for and therefore have a student loan. this means some of that money wil be taken back in repayments. i dont begrudge paying back what I have spent but it does mean that when people think that we earn loads and therefore dont need any help when we have a child, they should remember that after tax/sky high mortgage costs/student loan etc which come as a package deal with earning over the 27K limit significantly reduce disposable income
the BIG differentiator between what people earn and how much disposable income they end up with is the location they live in. compare some of the mortgage/rent costs people have quoted in this thread....i've seen everything from £1100 to £358. Yes they may have different size houses etc but its more than just that.
If you earn a higher income as a result of living in the wealthier area then not only are you taxed more (quite rightly) but you're not entitled to any benefits and your mortgage costs/council tax/travel costs are likely to be SIGNIFICANTLY higher as a result
Also, for those comparing how much they earn when you're paid less than the 27K limit then remember that 27K doesnt result to 2K in your bank account each month
someone earning 13K per year will only be taxed on 3K of what they earn so the difference is huge to those earning 27K.
Also, what if you have the higher earning job because of a degree you've studied for and therefore have a student loan. this means some of that money wil be taken back in repayments. i dont begrudge paying back what I have spent but it does mean that when people think that we earn loads and therefore dont need any help when we have a child, they should remember that after tax/sky high mortgage costs/student loan etc which come as a package deal with earning over the 27K limit significantly reduce disposable income
we were VERY lucky with the house price the man wanted £145k but the house had been on the market for 3 years and he had to move we knew he only paid £65k for it as its ex council so we offered £68k and he took the offer!!! we also had a £25k deposit so our mortgage is so low and we had the house valued last week at £138k so we know we should make money back and we took the mortgage over a longer time as we are young xx