Sorry if I'm sounding harsh hon. I do respect other peoples' views
It's just that my experience of this topic is clearly very different from some peoples. And peoples' beliefs shouldn't be used in ways which make life worse for others who do not accept those beliefs
Fair enough religious people can follow the bible or whatever their particular religion follows, but they should never force its content on those who do not accept it.
To me as an atheist, marriage is a union for love, stability, for security and for a promise to each other. A celebration of shared lives. It was introduced by humans for humans. And if it's not working for the humans involved... who else should put spanners in the works of parting peacefully?
I think the point that has been brought up here is that many of the posters' marriages
have broken down irretrievably; no sensible person could assert otherwise. But yet divorce is being made difficult or impossible because of things like expense, and difficult enough laws as it is - without new ones which make it harder still, as this thread was saying in the first place.
Mediation/reconciliation will not and cannot work where one side will not cooperate, where one or both parties are settled with new partners and in some cases children with these new partners. Similarly in cases where there's been abuse - and this can be mental/emotional as well as physical. Everyone's situation is different
The fact is, the people involved know when their relationship's broken down - condescending them with forced niceties in a mediation setting will seem to many as an insult to intelligence.
I also have to restate the point of funding too. If there's no more legal aid, anyone on normal wages will simply be stuck. Will this mediation be funded?
I know from experience that it's certainly not cheap and often simply fails. Paying for a session in which your ex storms off within the first 5 minutes is very frustrating!